Difference between revisions of "Hanrahan-etal2016"
m (url) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
|Author(s)=Benjamin V. Hanrahan; Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones; David Martin; | |Author(s)=Benjamin V. Hanrahan; Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones; David Martin; | ||
− | |Title=Attending to | + | |Title=Attending to email |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; email; user studies; | |Tag(s)=EMCA; email; user studies; | ||
|Key=Hanrahan-etal2016 | |Key=Hanrahan-etal2016 | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=28 | |Volume=28 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=253–272 |
− | |URL= | + | |URL=https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-abstract/28/3/253/1750356 |
|DOI=10.1093/iwc/iwu048 | |DOI=10.1093/iwc/iwu048 | ||
|Abstract=Email has become deeply embedded in many users’ daily lives. To investigate how email features in users lives, particularly how users attend to email, we ran a 2-week study that logged interactions with email and gathered diary entries related to individual sessions. Our study showed that the majority of attentional effort is around reading email and participating in conversations, as opposed to email management (deleting, moving, flagging emails). We found that participants attended to email primarily based on notifications, instead of the number of unread messages in their inbox. We present our results through answering several questions, and leverage conversation analysis, particularly conversational openings, to explicate several issues. Our findings point to inefficiencies in email as a communication medium, mainly, around how summons are (or are not) issued. This results in an increased burden on email users to maintain engagement and determine (or construct) the appropriate moment for interruption. | |Abstract=Email has become deeply embedded in many users’ daily lives. To investigate how email features in users lives, particularly how users attend to email, we ran a 2-week study that logged interactions with email and gathered diary entries related to individual sessions. Our study showed that the majority of attentional effort is around reading email and participating in conversations, as opposed to email management (deleting, moving, flagging emails). We found that participants attended to email primarily based on notifications, instead of the number of unread messages in their inbox. We present our results through answering several questions, and leverage conversation analysis, particularly conversational openings, to explicate several issues. Our findings point to inefficiencies in email as a communication medium, mainly, around how summons are (or are not) issued. This results in an increased burden on email users to maintain engagement and determine (or construct) the appropriate moment for interruption. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:46, 27 December 2019
Hanrahan-etal2016 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Hanrahan-etal2016 |
Author(s) | Benjamin V. Hanrahan, Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones, David Martin |
Title | Attending to email |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, email, user studies |
Publisher | |
Year | 2016 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Interacting with Computers |
Volume | 28 |
Number | 3 |
Pages | 253–272 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1093/iwc/iwu048 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Email has become deeply embedded in many users’ daily lives. To investigate how email features in users lives, particularly how users attend to email, we ran a 2-week study that logged interactions with email and gathered diary entries related to individual sessions. Our study showed that the majority of attentional effort is around reading email and participating in conversations, as opposed to email management (deleting, moving, flagging emails). We found that participants attended to email primarily based on notifications, instead of the number of unread messages in their inbox. We present our results through answering several questions, and leverage conversation analysis, particularly conversational openings, to explicate several issues. Our findings point to inefficiencies in email as a communication medium, mainly, around how summons are (or are not) issued. This results in an increased burden on email users to maintain engagement and determine (or construct) the appropriate moment for interruption.
Notes