Difference between revisions of "Mondada1998a"

Latest revision as of 23:36, 26 October 2019

Mondada1998a
BibType	ARTICLE
Key	Mondada1998a
Author(s)	Lorenza Mondada
Title	Therapy interactions: specific genre or “blow up” of ordinary conversational practices?
Editor(s)
Tag(s)	EMCA, Interactional Linguistics, Therapy
Publisher
Year	1998
Language	English
City
Month
Journal	Pragmatics
Volume	8
Number	2
Pages	155–165
URL	Link
DOI	10.1075/prag.8.2.02mon
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Abstract

Notes

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 |BibType=ARTICLE
 |Author(s)=Lorenza Mondada;
-|Title=Therapy interactions: specific genre or "blow up" of ordinary conversational practices?
+|Title=Therapy interactions: specific genre or “blow up” of ordinary conversational practices?
 |Tag(s)=EMCA ; Interactional Linguistics; Therapy;
 |Key=Mondada1998a
 |Year=1998
@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |Number=2
 |Pages=155–165
-|URL=http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/view/263/197
+|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.8.2.02mon
-|Abstract=The analyses of therapy interactions collected in this issue also reflect the different
+|DOI=10.1075/prag.8.2.02mon
-trends mentioned above, a tendency which can be observed in the diversity of the literature concerning  this  interdisciplinary  field. Given  the number and diversity of  the  types of corpora studied, together with the analytical approaches and the objectives aimed at, the articles published here indeed raise questions as to the specificity of these interactions – presupposing the existence of a certain homogeneity in their form and structure – and as to their relationships with other kinds of interaction. The question is, therefore: what are the results  and  the  consequences,  both  theoretical  and  descriptive,  of  analyses  of  specific therapy interactions (analyses such as those presented in this issue)?
 }}