Difference between revisions of "Kristiansen-etal2017"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen; Ann Katrine Marstrand; Jalal El Derbas; |Title=Repeating a Searched-For Word With an Agreement Token in “...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen; Ann Katrine Marstrand; Jalal El Derbas;
 
|Author(s)=Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen; Ann Katrine Marstrand; Jalal El Derbas;
 
|Title=Repeating a Searched-For Word With an Agreement Token in “Challenged Interaction”
 
|Title=Repeating a Searched-For Word With an Agreement Token in “Challenged Interaction”
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Word searches; Epistemic authority; Second Language; Dementia; Membership; Communicative competence;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Word searches; Epistemic authority; Second Language; Dementia; Membership; Communicative competence;
 
|Key=Kristiansen-etal2017
 
|Key=Kristiansen-etal2017
 
|Year=2017
 
|Year=2017
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|Number=4
 
|Number=4
 
|Pages=388-403
 
|Pages=388-403
 +
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2017.1375803
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1375803
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1375803
|Abstract=When one is searching for a word, another person may provide it. This
+
|Abstract=When one is searching for a word, another person may provide it. This article is about what happens next—specifically, what happens when the first speaker repeats the offered word and adds an agreement token, before or after. We analyze this practice across three data sets of “challenged interaction” (second language interaction in Danish, and English and Danish atypical interaction). When a “challenged” search initiator (e.g., a person with dementia) puts the agreement token after the repeat, that claims epistemic authority and demonstrates competence; conversely, if they put the agreement token before the repeat, that seems to defer to others’ claims of epistemic authority and competence. The article contributes to conversation analytic studies of atypical interaction and deviance by describing how speakers in “challenged interaction” deal with competence as a practical problem. Data is in English, Arabic, and Danish with English translations.
article is about what happens next—specifically, what happens when the
 
first speaker repeats the offered word and adds an agreement token, before
 
or after. We analyze this practice across three data sets of “challenged
 
interaction” (second language interaction in Danish, and English and
 
Danish atypical interaction). When a “challenged” search initiator (e.g., a
 
person with dementia) puts the agreement token after the repeat, that
 
claims epistemic authority and demonstrates competence; conversely, if
 
they put the agreement token before the repeat, that seems to defer to
 
others’ claims of epistemic authority and competence. The article contri-
 
butes to conversation analytic studies of atypical interaction and deviance
 
by describing how speakers in “challenged interaction” deal with compe-
 
tence as a practical problem. Data is in English, Arabic, and Danish with
 
English translations.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 06:26, 13 September 2023

Kristiansen-etal2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Kristiansen-etal2017
Author(s) Elisabeth Dalby Kristiansen, Ann Katrine Marstrand, Jalal El Derbas
Title Repeating a Searched-For Word With an Agreement Token in “Challenged Interaction”
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Word searches, Epistemic authority, Second Language, Dementia, Membership, Communicative competence
Publisher
Year 2017
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 50
Number 4
Pages 388-403
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2017.1375803
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

When one is searching for a word, another person may provide it. This article is about what happens next—specifically, what happens when the first speaker repeats the offered word and adds an agreement token, before or after. We analyze this practice across three data sets of “challenged interaction” (second language interaction in Danish, and English and Danish atypical interaction). When a “challenged” search initiator (e.g., a person with dementia) puts the agreement token after the repeat, that claims epistemic authority and demonstrates competence; conversely, if they put the agreement token before the repeat, that seems to defer to others’ claims of epistemic authority and competence. The article contributes to conversation analytic studies of atypical interaction and deviance by describing how speakers in “challenged interaction” deal with competence as a practical problem. Data is in English, Arabic, and Danish with English translations.

Notes