Difference between revisions of "Gibson2000"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=David R. Gibson; |Title=Seizing the Moment: The Problem of Conversational Agency |Tag(s)=EMCA; Agency; Social Theory; |Key=Gibson2000...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=David R. Gibson; | + | |Author(s)=David R. Gibson; |
|Title=Seizing the Moment: The Problem of Conversational Agency | |Title=Seizing the Moment: The Problem of Conversational Agency | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Agency; Social Theory; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Agency; Social Theory; |
|Key=Gibson2000 | |Key=Gibson2000 | ||
|Year=2000 | |Year=2000 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Volume=18 | |Volume=18 | ||
|Number=3 | |Number=3 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=368–382 |
| − | | | + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/0735-2751.00106 |
| + | |DOI=10.1111/0735-2751.00106 | ||
|Abstract=In conversation, actors face constraints on when they can speak, whom they can address, what they can say, and what they can safely expect from others by way of cooperation. This is the backdrop against which people pursue their idiosyncratic interests and objectives, success at which constitutes conversational agency. In principle, agency is made possible by the “looseness” of conversational constraints. This does not create a clear path for the advancement of personal ends, however, since options are always limited by the context, and success is always contingent upon the cooperation of others. Ultimately, the most agentic people are those who readily exploit imperfect options though this means abandoning the inflexible pursuit of pre-conceived objectives. | |Abstract=In conversation, actors face constraints on when they can speak, whom they can address, what they can say, and what they can safely expect from others by way of cooperation. This is the backdrop against which people pursue their idiosyncratic interests and objectives, success at which constitutes conversational agency. In principle, agency is made possible by the “looseness” of conversational constraints. This does not create a clear path for the advancement of personal ends, however, since options are always limited by the context, and success is always contingent upon the cooperation of others. Ultimately, the most agentic people are those who readily exploit imperfect options though this means abandoning the inflexible pursuit of pre-conceived objectives. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:36, 19 October 2019
| Gibson2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Gibson2000 |
| Author(s) | David R. Gibson |
| Title | Seizing the Moment: The Problem of Conversational Agency |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Agency, Social Theory |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociological Theory |
| Volume | 18 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | 368–382 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/0735-2751.00106 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In conversation, actors face constraints on when they can speak, whom they can address, what they can say, and what they can safely expect from others by way of cooperation. This is the backdrop against which people pursue their idiosyncratic interests and objectives, success at which constitutes conversational agency. In principle, agency is made possible by the “looseness” of conversational constraints. This does not create a clear path for the advancement of personal ends, however, since options are always limited by the context, and success is always contingent upon the cooperation of others. Ultimately, the most agentic people are those who readily exploit imperfect options though this means abandoning the inflexible pursuit of pre-conceived objectives.
Notes
