Difference between revisions of "Nyroos2014"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lina Nyroos; Erica Sandlund; |Title=From paper to practice: Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance apprai...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Lina Nyroos; Erica Sandlund; | + | |Author(s)=Lina Nyroos; Erica Sandlund; |
|Title=From paper to practice: Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews | |Title=From paper to practice: Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews | ||
| − | |Tag(s)= | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Job Interviews; Questioning; |
|Key=Nyroos2014 | |Key=Nyroos2014 | ||
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=5 | |Volume=5 | ||
|Number=2 | |Number=2 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=165–190 |
| + | |URL=http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr | ||
| + | |Abstract=This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:59, 9 March 2016
| Nyroos2014 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Nyroos2014 |
| Author(s) | Lina Nyroos, Erica Sandlund |
| Title | From paper to practice: Asking and responding to a standardized question item in performance appraisal interviews |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Job Interviews, Questioning |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Pragmatics and Society |
| Volume | 5 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 165–190 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1075/ps.5.2.01nyr |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper examines how a standardized question is launched and received in a corpus of performance appraisal interviews, with a focus on how pre-formulated questions are translated into interaction. Using conversation analysis, we demonstrate that the same question becomes many different actions in practice. Prefaces as well as prosodic and lexical alterations make relevant different responses, and as such, the question can be recruited to initiate diverse interactional projects such as assessments and other socially delicate activities. As a consequence, goals of uniformity and standardization may be subverted. The interactional adaptations further evidence the strength of recipient design as reformulations also result in more fitted and personalized answers. Our study contributes to the understanding of standardization versus interactionalization, and points to the strong interrelationship between question design and the fitting of response options.
Notes
