Difference between revisions of "Streeck2014"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|BibType=INCOLLECTION
 
|Author(s)=Jürgen Streeck
 
|Author(s)=Jürgen Streeck
|Title=Mutual gaze and recognition: Revisiting Kendon's "Gaze direction in two-person conversation"
+
|Title=Mutual gaze and recognition: Revisiting Kendon's 'Gaze direction in two-person conversation
 
|Editor(s)=Mandana Seyfeddinipur; Marianne Gullberg;
 
|Editor(s)=Mandana Seyfeddinipur; Marianne Gullberg;
|Tag(s)=EMCA;
+
|Tag(s)=Related Interaction Studies;
 
|Key=Streeck2014
 
|Key=Streeck2014
|Publisher=John Benjamins Publishing Company
+
|Publisher=John Benjamins
 
|Year=2014
 
|Year=2014
|Booktitle=From gesture in conversation to visible action as utterance: Essays in honor of Adam Kendon
+
|Language=English
|Pages=35-56
+
|Address=Amsterdam / Philadelphia
 +
|Booktitle=From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in Honor of Adam Kendon
 +
|Pages=35–56
 +
|URL=https://benjamins.com/catalog/z.188.03str
 
|DOI=10.1075/z.188.03str
 
|DOI=10.1075/z.188.03str
 
|Abstract=In "Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversation," Adam Kendon provided the first systematic account of the organization of gaze in conversational interaction, arguing that here gaze behavior serves the regulation of speaker- and listenership. Recently, Rossano (2012) has argued that gaze direction, instead, operates in the context of action sequences and varies by action type. This chapter describes the gaze behavior of a single person in interactions with a variety of others. The focus is on a routine gaze sequence, consonant with Rossano's account, whose initiator establishes transitory or sustained gaze with the recipient during the initial action, and both parties withdraw gaze from one another during sequence completion. Arguably this patterns shows that mutual gaze can serve as a minimal form of social contract by which acts are ratified as intersubjective facts.
 
|Abstract=In "Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversation," Adam Kendon provided the first systematic account of the organization of gaze in conversational interaction, arguing that here gaze behavior serves the regulation of speaker- and listenership. Recently, Rossano (2012) has argued that gaze direction, instead, operates in the context of action sequences and varies by action type. This chapter describes the gaze behavior of a single person in interactions with a variety of others. The focus is on a routine gaze sequence, consonant with Rossano's account, whose initiator establishes transitory or sustained gaze with the recipient during the initial action, and both parties withdraw gaze from one another during sequence completion. Arguably this patterns shows that mutual gaze can serve as a minimal form of social contract by which acts are ratified as intersubjective facts.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:02, 7 December 2019

Streeck2014
BibType INCOLLECTION
Key Streeck2014
Author(s) Jürgen Streeck
Title Mutual gaze and recognition: Revisiting Kendon's 'Gaze direction in two-person conversation
Editor(s) Mandana Seyfeddinipur, Marianne Gullberg
Tag(s) Related Interaction Studies
Publisher John Benjamins
Year 2014
Language English
City Amsterdam / Philadelphia
Month
Journal
Volume
Number
Pages 35–56
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/z.188.03str
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title From Gesture in Conversation to Visible Action as Utterance: Essays in Honor of Adam Kendon
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In "Some functions of gaze direction in two-person conversation," Adam Kendon provided the first systematic account of the organization of gaze in conversational interaction, arguing that here gaze behavior serves the regulation of speaker- and listenership. Recently, Rossano (2012) has argued that gaze direction, instead, operates in the context of action sequences and varies by action type. This chapter describes the gaze behavior of a single person in interactions with a variety of others. The focus is on a routine gaze sequence, consonant with Rossano's account, whose initiator establishes transitory or sustained gaze with the recipient during the initial action, and both parties withdraw gaze from one another during sequence completion. Arguably this patterns shows that mutual gaze can serve as a minimal form of social contract by which acts are ratified as intersubjective facts.

Notes