Difference between revisions of "Bonkova2004"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Jana Bonková; |Title=Etnometodologický prístup a príklad degradačných postupov |Tag(s)=EMCA; |Key=Bonkova2004 |Year=2004 |Language...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=361-376 | |Pages=361-376 | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |URL=https://optim.sav.sk/journals/uploads/02081318BONKOVA.pdf |
|Note=Ethnomethodological Approach: The Case of Degradation Practises | |Note=Ethnomethodological Approach: The Case of Degradation Practises | ||
| − | + | |Abstract=In the first part, besides a basic characterisation of the ethnomethodological approach, this paper deals with four premises concerning peculiarity of ethnomethodology. First, it entails a different object and method of research. By asking the question „why“, researchers investigate the „practices“ or „labour“ involved in producing orderly and coherent social interaction. Second, it focuses on ordinary language / speech, derived from the combined influence of phenomenology, Wittgenstein and Bar-Hillel. The third premise in the article is that „action“ and „account“ are identical. Fourthly, member’s common-sense practices and knowledge is examined. The second part of the paper considers various kinds of research, mainly „ethnographic ethnomethodology“. As an example, one of the „degradation rituals“ from Garfinkel is provided. It is suggested that Garfinkel´s concept of degradation ceremonies could be elaborated upon by some Jayyussi´s ideas about member’s moral categorisation. | |
| − | |Abstract=In the first part, besides a basic characterisation of the ethnomethodological approach, this paper deals with four premises concerning peculiarity of ethnomethodology. First, it | ||
| − | entails a different object and method of research. By asking the question „why“, researchers investigate the „practices“ or „labour“ involved in producing orderly and coherent social interaction. Second, it focuses on ordinary language / speech, derived from the combined influence of phenomenology, Wittgenstein and Bar-Hillel. The third | ||
| − | premise in the article is that „action“ and „account“ are identical. Fourthly, member’s common-sense practices and knowledge is examined. The second part of the paper considers various kinds of research, mainly „ethnographic ethnomethodology“. As an example, one of | ||
| − | the „degradation rituals“ from Garfinkel is provided. It is suggested that | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:28, 1 November 2019
| Bonkova2004 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Bonkova2004 |
| Author(s) | Jana Bonková |
| Title | Etnometodologický prístup a príklad degradačných postupov |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2004 |
| Language | Slovak |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociológia |
| Volume | 36 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 361-376 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In the first part, besides a basic characterisation of the ethnomethodological approach, this paper deals with four premises concerning peculiarity of ethnomethodology. First, it entails a different object and method of research. By asking the question „why“, researchers investigate the „practices“ or „labour“ involved in producing orderly and coherent social interaction. Second, it focuses on ordinary language / speech, derived from the combined influence of phenomenology, Wittgenstein and Bar-Hillel. The third premise in the article is that „action“ and „account“ are identical. Fourthly, member’s common-sense practices and knowledge is examined. The second part of the paper considers various kinds of research, mainly „ethnographic ethnomethodology“. As an example, one of the „degradation rituals“ from Garfinkel is provided. It is suggested that Garfinkel´s concept of degradation ceremonies could be elaborated upon by some Jayyussi´s ideas about member’s moral categorisation.
Notes
Ethnomethodological Approach: The Case of Degradation Practises
