Difference between revisions of "Nevile2011"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS |Author(s)=Maurice Nevile; |Title=The real thing: Artifacts, action and authenticity in a student-led stakeholder session |Editor(s)=J. Burr...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | |BibType=INPROCEEDINGS | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Maurice Nevile; | + | |Author(s)=Maurice Nevile; |
|Title=The real thing: Artifacts, action and authenticity in a student-led stakeholder session | |Title=The real thing: Artifacts, action and authenticity in a student-led stakeholder session | ||
| − | |Editor(s)= | + | |Editor(s)=Jacob Buur |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Artefacts; Action; Authenticity; Stakeholders; Design; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Artefacts; Action; Authenticity; Stakeholders; Design; |
|Key=Nevile2011 | |Key=Nevile2011 | ||
|Publisher=University of Southern Denmark | |Publisher=University of Southern Denmark | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
|Address=Sonderberg | |Address=Sonderberg | ||
| − | |URL= | + | |Booktitle=PIN-C 2011: Participatory Innovation Conference Proceedings |
| − | + | |Pages=84–90 | |
| − | |Abstract= | + | |URL=http://pin-c.sdu.dk/assets/the-real-thing---artifacts%2c-action-and-authenticity-in-a-student-led-stakeholder-session---maurice-nevile---84-90---pinc-2011.pdf |
| − | stakeholders’ use of artifacts, a cardboard prototype toaster and a real toaster. | + | |Abstract=This paper analyses video recordings of a student-led prototyping session to consider stakeholders’ use of artifacts, a cardboard prototype toaster and a real toaster. Its focus was prompted by an observation that stakeholders treated the toasters very diff erently. Stakeholders handled the real toaster more frequently and for particular interactional value. Unlike the prototype, it could be physical and visible evidence to authenticate actions for design discussion, such as claims, descriptions, and demonstrations. Th e real toaster could be a resource to coordinate with talk relating to actual toaster features, functions, and uses, or to participants’ actual past experiences, or to make suggestions for specific design innovations. |
| − | Its focus was prompted by an observation that stakeholders treated the toasters | ||
| − | very diff erently. Stakeholders handled the real toaster more frequently and for particular | ||
| − | interactional value. Unlike the prototype, it could be physical and visible | ||
| − | evidence to authenticate actions for design discussion, such as claims, descriptions, | ||
| − | and demonstrations. Th e real toaster could be a resource to coordinate with | ||
| − | talk relating to actual toaster features, functions, and uses, or to participants’ actual | ||
| − | past experiences, or to make suggestions for | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 07:26, 28 November 2019
| Nevile2011 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INPROCEEDINGS |
| Key | Nevile2011 |
| Author(s) | Maurice Nevile |
| Title | The real thing: Artifacts, action and authenticity in a student-led stakeholder session |
| Editor(s) | Jacob Buur |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Artefacts, Action, Authenticity, Stakeholders, Design |
| Publisher | University of Southern Denmark |
| Year | 2011 |
| Language | |
| City | Sonderberg |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 84–90 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | PIN-C 2011: Participatory Innovation Conference Proceedings |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper analyses video recordings of a student-led prototyping session to consider stakeholders’ use of artifacts, a cardboard prototype toaster and a real toaster. Its focus was prompted by an observation that stakeholders treated the toasters very diff erently. Stakeholders handled the real toaster more frequently and for particular interactional value. Unlike the prototype, it could be physical and visible evidence to authenticate actions for design discussion, such as claims, descriptions, and demonstrations. Th e real toaster could be a resource to coordinate with talk relating to actual toaster features, functions, and uses, or to participants’ actual past experiences, or to make suggestions for specific design innovations.
Notes
