Difference between revisions of "Monzoni2008"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni; |Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of pre-sequences |Tag(s)=EMCA;...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni; | + | |Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni; |
− | |Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: | + | |Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of pre-sequences |
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Complaints; Conversation Analysis; Questions; Pre-sequences; Turn Design | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Complaints; Conversation Analysis; Questions; Pre-sequences; Turn Design | ||
|Key=Monzoni2008 | |Key=Monzoni2008 | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=10 | |Volume=10 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=1 |
+ | |Pages=73–87 | ||
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445607085591 | |URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445607085591 | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1177/1461445607085591 | ||
|Abstract=This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients. | |Abstract=This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 11:50, 20 November 2019
Monzoni2008 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Monzoni2008 |
Author(s) | Chiara M. Monzoni |
Title | Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of pre-sequences |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Complaints, Conversation Analysis, Questions, Pre-sequences, Turn Design |
Publisher | |
Year | 2008 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 10 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 73–87 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445607085591 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients.
Notes