Difference between revisions of "Monzoni2008"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni; |Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of pre-sequences |Tag(s)=EMCA;...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni;  
+
|Author(s)=Chiara M. Monzoni;
|Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: The interactional achievement of pre-sequences
+
|Title=Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of pre-sequences
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Complaints; Conversation Analysis; Questions; Pre-sequences; Turn Design
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Complaints; Conversation Analysis; Questions; Pre-sequences; Turn Design
 
|Key=Monzoni2008
 
|Key=Monzoni2008
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Volume=10
 
|Volume=10
|Pages=73-87
+
|Number=1
 +
|Pages=73–87
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445607085591
 
|URL=http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461445607085591
 +
|DOI=10.1177/1461445607085591
 
|Abstract=This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients.
 
|Abstract=This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 12:50, 20 November 2019

Monzoni2008
BibType ARTICLE
Key Monzoni2008
Author(s) Chiara M. Monzoni
Title Introducing direct complaints through questions: the interactional achievement of pre-sequences
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Complaints, Conversation Analysis, Questions, Pre-sequences, Turn Design
Publisher
Year 2008
Language
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 10
Number 1
Pages 73–87
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445607085591
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article considers how two different question designs as positive polar questions and wh-questions occurring in different interactional contexts (institutional calls and ordinary face-to-face interactions) set up a sequence in which a direct complaint is produced in third position as the result of an interactional achievement. Positive polar questions are employed to establish immediately a common ground of understandability between caller and call-taker. Wh-questions are used as challenges and speakers subsequently provide explicit grounds for the challenges in third turns, due to the interpretation of the question given by their recipients.

Notes