Difference between revisions of "Seuren-Huiskes2017"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes; |Title=Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?, |Tag(s)=EMCA; Confirmation request...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes;
 
|Author(s)=Lucas M. Seuren; Mike Huiskes;
 
|Title=Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?,
 
|Title=Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?,
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Confirmation requests; Elaboration; Dutch;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Confirmation requests; Elaboration; Dutch;
 
|Key=Seuren-Huiskes2017
 
|Key=Seuren-Huiskes2017
 
|Year=2017
 
|Year=2017
|Journal=Research on Language & Social Interaction
+
|Language=English
 +
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction
 
|Volume=50
 
|Volume=50
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
 
|Pages=188-205
 
|Pages=188-205
 +
|URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307
 
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307
|Abstract=Recent analyses have argued that when requests for confirmation are
+
|Abstract=Recent analyses have argued that when requests for confirmation are implemented with declarative word order, they are closure-implicative due to the relatively knowing stance indexed with the declarative. This article demonstrates, however, that in some cases participants show an orientation to both confirmation and elaboration as a relevant next action. By comparing requests for confirmation that are closure-implicative to those that are expansion-implicative, it is argued that in addition to epistemic stance, participants also orient to the lexical design features and sequential placement of these declarative yes/no-type initiating actions to determine the relevant type of response. Data are in Dutch with English translations.
implemented with declarative word order, they are closure-implicative
 
due to the relatively knowing stance indexed with the declarative. This
 
article demonstrates, however, that in some cases participants show an
 
orientation to both confirmation and elaboration as a relevant next action.
 
By comparing requests for confirmation that are closure-implicative to
 
those that are expansion-implicative, it is argued that in addition to epis-
 
temic stance, participants also orient to the lexical design features and
 
sequential placement of these declarative yes/no-type initiating actions to
 
determine the relevant type of response. Data are in Dutch with English
 
translations.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 01:45, 4 September 2023

Seuren-Huiskes2017
BibType ARTICLE
Key Seuren-Huiskes2017
Author(s) Lucas M. Seuren, Mike Huiskes
Title Confirmation or Elaboration: What Do Yes/No Declaratives Want?,
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Confirmation requests, Elaboration, Dutch
Publisher
Year 2017
Language English
City
Month
Journal Research on Language and Social Interaction
Volume 50
Number 2
Pages 188-205
URL Link
DOI 10.1080/08351813.2017.1301307
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Recent analyses have argued that when requests for confirmation are implemented with declarative word order, they are closure-implicative due to the relatively knowing stance indexed with the declarative. This article demonstrates, however, that in some cases participants show an orientation to both confirmation and elaboration as a relevant next action. By comparing requests for confirmation that are closure-implicative to those that are expansion-implicative, it is argued that in addition to epistemic stance, participants also orient to the lexical design features and sequential placement of these declarative yes/no-type initiating actions to determine the relevant type of response. Data are in Dutch with English translations.

Notes