Difference between revisions of "Svahn2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2017-08-04 06:26:34)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=ARTICLE
 +
|Author(s)=Johanna Svahn;
 +
|Title=Reported speech in girls' dispute stories: Building credibility and accounting for moral versions
 +
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnography; microanalysis; peer disputes; preadolescent girls; reported speech; storytelling
 
|Key=Svahn2016
 
|Key=Svahn2016
|Key=Svahn2016
 
|Title=Reported speech in girls' dispute stories: Building credibility and accounting for moral versions
 
|Author(s)=Johanna Svahn;
 
|Tag(s)=Ethnography; microanalysis; peer disputes; preadolescent girls; reported speech; storytelling
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Publisher=SAGE Publications
 
 
|Year=2016
 
|Year=2016
|Month=jun
+
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Childhood
 
|Journal=Childhood
 
|Volume=24
 
|Volume=24
 
|Number=2
 
|Number=2
 
|Pages=212–229
 
|Pages=212–229
|URL=https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568216651933
+
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0907568216651933
 
|DOI=10.1177/0907568216651933
 
|DOI=10.1177/0907568216651933
 
|Abstract=The study targets how reported speech is used as an interactional resource for building and legitimatizing a particular version of events in the context of peer disputes. Several unfolding multiparty storytelling events within a group of preadolescent girls in a Swedish school setting are analyzed, primarily highlighting the interactional use of previous talk in building credibility for particular affective and moral stances, as well as blame accusations during disputes. Overall, the study highlights different ways that reported speech can function as a resource for legitimizing negative assessments of opposite parties, building alliances, and taking sanctioning actions toward peers.
 
|Abstract=The study targets how reported speech is used as an interactional resource for building and legitimatizing a particular version of events in the context of peer disputes. Several unfolding multiparty storytelling events within a group of preadolescent girls in a Swedish school setting are analyzed, primarily highlighting the interactional use of previous talk in building credibility for particular affective and moral stances, as well as blame accusations during disputes. Overall, the study highlights different ways that reported speech can function as a resource for legitimizing negative assessments of opposite parties, building alliances, and taking sanctioning actions toward peers.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 08:29, 17 December 2019

Svahn2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Svahn2016
Author(s) Johanna Svahn
Title Reported speech in girls' dispute stories: Building credibility and accounting for moral versions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnography, microanalysis, peer disputes, preadolescent girls, reported speech, storytelling
Publisher
Year 2016
Language English
City
Month
Journal Childhood
Volume 24
Number 2
Pages 212–229
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/0907568216651933
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The study targets how reported speech is used as an interactional resource for building and legitimatizing a particular version of events in the context of peer disputes. Several unfolding multiparty storytelling events within a group of preadolescent girls in a Swedish school setting are analyzed, primarily highlighting the interactional use of previous talk in building credibility for particular affective and moral stances, as well as blame accusations during disputes. Overall, the study highlights different ways that reported speech can function as a resource for legitimizing negative assessments of opposite parties, building alliances, and taking sanctioning actions toward peers.

Notes