Difference between revisions of "Sharrock-etal2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Wes Sharrock; Dave Randall; Christian Greiffenhagen; |Title=Engineering the Scientific Corpus: Routine Semantic Work in (Re)constructin...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Wes Sharrock; Dave Randall; Christian Greiffenhagen;  
+
|Author(s)=Wes W. Sharrock; Dave Randall; Christian Greiffenhagen;
|Title=Engineering the Scientific Corpus: Routine Semantic Work in (Re)constructing a Biological Ontology
+
|Title=Engineering the scientific corpus: routine semantic work in (re)constructing a biological ontology
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Biology; Ontology; Social Studies of Science;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Biology; Ontology; Social Studies of Science;
 
|Key=Sharrock-etal2011
 
|Key=Sharrock-etal2011
 
|Year=2011
 
|Year=2011
 
|Journal=Ethnographic Studies
 
|Journal=Ethnographic Studies
 
|Volume=12
 
|Volume=12
|Pages=106-125
+
|Pages=106–125
|URL=http://www.zhbluzern.ch/seiten/ethnographic-studies/ethnographic-studies-issue-no-12-2011/
+
|URL=https://zenodo.org/record/31673
|Abstract=In  face  of  the  burgeoning  interest  in ‘ontology’  in  science  studies, Michael
 
Lynch (2008) called for a move toward ‘ontography’,  to  talking  about ontologies by way of  studies  in which ontologies (or at least, an ontology) are of  demonstrable  relevance  to  the doings of those being studied. 
 
This paper provides an ontography, or some  part  of  one,  in  that  it  reports  on
 
work  in  ontology  development  being done  by  a  group  of  researchers  in bioinformatics,  drawing  its  examples largely  from  a  workshop  in  which some  members  of  that  group  were participant  and  which  was  organised by  a  research  network  to  which  they belonged. Methodologies  for  building ‘good’  ontologies  were  part  of  the interests  of  this  wider  research  group and  were  a  motivation  for  the  work undertaken. What    is evident  from our study  is  the  fact  that  methods  to  be applied,  avenues  to  be  explored  and even fundamental purposes were all  in
 
the  event  ‘up  for  grabs’  and  formed  a closely  interlinked  and  mutually
 
explicating  part  of  the  ‘logic  in practice’ deployed. 
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 06:03, 28 November 2019

Sharrock-etal2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sharrock-etal2011
Author(s) Wes W. Sharrock, Dave Randall, Christian Greiffenhagen
Title Engineering the scientific corpus: routine semantic work in (re)constructing a biological ontology
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Biology, Ontology, Social Studies of Science
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Ethnographic Studies
Volume 12
Number
Pages 106–125
URL Link
DOI
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract


Notes