Difference between revisions of "Bateman2011"
BurakTekin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Amanda Bateman; |Title=Huts and heartache: The affordance of playground huts for legal debate in early childhood social organisation |T...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Amanda Bateman; | + | |Author(s)=Amanda Bateman; |
|Title=Huts and heartache: The affordance of playground huts for legal debate in early childhood social organisation | |Title=Huts and heartache: The affordance of playground huts for legal debate in early childhood social organisation | ||
− | |Tag(s)=Early childhood; Spatial affordances; Rule making; Conversation | + | |Tag(s)=Early childhood; Spatial affordances; Rule making; Conversation Analysis; Membership Categorization Analysis; Ethnomethodology; |
|Key=Bateman2011 | |Key=Bateman2011 | ||
|Year=2011 | |Year=2011 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=43 | |Volume=43 | ||
|Number=13 | |Number=13 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=3111–3121 |
− | | | + | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216611001901 |
+ | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.002 | ||
|Abstract=This article discusses the way in which four-year-old children engaged in the complex co-production of rules and social governance in their primary school playground in Wales, UK. Through an inductive investigation into children's everyday social interactions at morning break time the child's view of their spatial affordances can be revealed. These affordances are the spaces the children talk into being (Heritage, 1978) and to what end. By making explicit reference to the wooden huts in their co-production of playground rules and governance the children talked those spaces into being and made them noticeable as important places for the practice of such agency in their everyday social organisation process. | |Abstract=This article discusses the way in which four-year-old children engaged in the complex co-production of rules and social governance in their primary school playground in Wales, UK. Through an inductive investigation into children's everyday social interactions at morning break time the child's view of their spatial affordances can be revealed. These affordances are the spaces the children talk into being (Heritage, 1978) and to what end. By making explicit reference to the wooden huts in their co-production of playground rules and governance the children talked those spaces into being and made them noticeable as important places for the practice of such agency in their everyday social organisation process. | ||
− | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 01:14, 29 November 2019
Bateman2011 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Bateman2011 |
Author(s) | Amanda Bateman |
Title | Huts and heartache: The affordance of playground huts for legal debate in early childhood social organisation |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Early childhood, Spatial affordances, Rule making, Conversation Analysis, Membership Categorization Analysis, Ethnomethodology |
Publisher | |
Year | 2011 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 43 |
Number | 13 |
Pages | 3111–3121 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.002 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article discusses the way in which four-year-old children engaged in the complex co-production of rules and social governance in their primary school playground in Wales, UK. Through an inductive investigation into children's everyday social interactions at morning break time the child's view of their spatial affordances can be revealed. These affordances are the spaces the children talk into being (Heritage, 1978) and to what end. By making explicit reference to the wooden huts in their co-production of playground rules and governance the children talked those spaces into being and made them noticeable as important places for the practice of such agency in their everyday social organisation process.
Notes