Difference between revisions of "Stevanovic-etal2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melisa Stevanovic; Tommi Himberg; Maija Niinisalo; Mikko Kahri; Anssi Peräkylä; Mikko Sams; Riitta Hari; |Title=Sequentiality, Mutual...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|Key=Stevanovic-etal2017 | |Key=Stevanovic-etal2017 | ||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| − | |Journal=Research on Language | + | |Language=English |
| + | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=50 | |Volume=50 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=33-53 | |Pages=33-53 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130 | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130 | ||
| − | |Abstract=We studied behavioral matching during joint decision making. Drawing | + | |Abstract=We studied behavioral matching during joint decision making. Drawing on motion-capture and voice data from 12 dyads, we analyzed body-sway and pitch-register matching during sequential transitions and continuations, with and without mutual visibility. Body sway was matched most strongly during sequential transitions in the conditions of mutual visibility. Pitch-register matching was higher during sequential transitions than continuations only when the participants could not see each other. These results suggest that both body sway and pitch register are used to manage sequential transitions, while mutual visibility influences the relative weights of these two resources. The conversational data are in Finnish with English translation. |
| − | on motion-capture and voice data from 12 dyads, we analyzed body- | ||
| − | sway and pitch-register matching during sequential transitions and | ||
| − | |||
| − | most strongly during sequential transitions in the conditions of mutual | ||
| − | visibility. Pitch-register matching was higher during sequential | ||
| − | |||
| − | other. These results suggest that both body sway and pitch register are | ||
| − | used to manage sequential transitions, while mutual visibility influences | ||
| − | the relative weights of these two resources. The conversational data are | ||
| − | in Finnish with English translation. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:06, 31 August 2023
| Stevanovic-etal2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stevanovic-etal2017 |
| Author(s) | Melisa Stevanovic, Tommi Himberg, Maija Niinisalo, Mikko Kahri, Anssi Peräkylä, Mikko Sams, Riitta Hari |
| Title | Sequentiality, Mutual Visibility, and Behavioral Matching: Body Sway and Pitch Register During Joint Decision Making |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Sequence organization, Visibility, Body, Decision Making, Matching |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 50 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 33-53 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2017.1262130 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
We studied behavioral matching during joint decision making. Drawing on motion-capture and voice data from 12 dyads, we analyzed body-sway and pitch-register matching during sequential transitions and continuations, with and without mutual visibility. Body sway was matched most strongly during sequential transitions in the conditions of mutual visibility. Pitch-register matching was higher during sequential transitions than continuations only when the participants could not see each other. These results suggest that both body sway and pitch register are used to manage sequential transitions, while mutual visibility influences the relative weights of these two resources. The conversational data are in Finnish with English translation.
Notes
