Difference between revisions of "Keevallik2011"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik; |Title=Grammar for adjusting assumptions: The Estonian enclitic -gi-/-ki in interaction |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Li...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik;  
+
|Author(s)=Leelo Keevallik;
 
|Title=Grammar for adjusting assumptions: The Estonian enclitic -gi-/-ki in interaction
 
|Title=Grammar for adjusting assumptions: The Estonian enclitic -gi-/-ki in interaction
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Estonian; Epistemics; Mutual Knowledge; Morphology; Enclitic
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional Linguistics; Estonian; Epistemics; Mutual Knowledge; Morphology; Enclitic
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=43
 
|Volume=43
 
|Number=12
 
|Number=12
|Pages=2879-2896
+
|Pages=2879–2896
 
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216611001354
 
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216611001354
|DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.001
+
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.001
 
|Abstract=The article shows how a bound morpheme, the enclitic -gi/-ki in Estonian, functions in the domain of interpersonal relations and mutual knowledge calibration in conversation. Speakers use the enclitic with verbs in order to adjust some assumption previously held by themselves or by their interlocutors. When formulating contributions in talk, participants always display assumptions about matters at hand as well as about what they believe other participants know. Furthermore, when accomplishing a first action in a sequence, they display an assumption that the next speaker will align in her action. All these assumptions are subject to adjustment by other participants who may present themselves as more knowledgeable on the subject matter or more entitled to provide opinions about it. The enclitic is used in reactive turns to indicate better epistemic access and higher authority in relation to a prior speaker, which may result in a disaligning action.
 
|Abstract=The article shows how a bound morpheme, the enclitic -gi/-ki in Estonian, functions in the domain of interpersonal relations and mutual knowledge calibration in conversation. Speakers use the enclitic with verbs in order to adjust some assumption previously held by themselves or by their interlocutors. When formulating contributions in talk, participants always display assumptions about matters at hand as well as about what they believe other participants know. Furthermore, when accomplishing a first action in a sequence, they display an assumption that the next speaker will align in her action. All these assumptions are subject to adjustment by other participants who may present themselves as more knowledgeable on the subject matter or more entitled to provide opinions about it. The enclitic is used in reactive turns to indicate better epistemic access and higher authority in relation to a prior speaker, which may result in a disaligning action.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 11:53, 28 November 2019

Keevallik2011
BibType ARTICLE
Key Keevallik2011
Author(s) Leelo Keevallik
Title Grammar for adjusting assumptions: The Estonian enclitic -gi-/-ki in interaction
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Interactional Linguistics, Estonian, Epistemics, Mutual Knowledge, Morphology, Enclitic
Publisher
Year 2011
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 43
Number 12
Pages 2879–2896
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2011.05.001
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The article shows how a bound morpheme, the enclitic -gi/-ki in Estonian, functions in the domain of interpersonal relations and mutual knowledge calibration in conversation. Speakers use the enclitic with verbs in order to adjust some assumption previously held by themselves or by their interlocutors. When formulating contributions in talk, participants always display assumptions about matters at hand as well as about what they believe other participants know. Furthermore, when accomplishing a first action in a sequence, they display an assumption that the next speaker will align in her action. All these assumptions are subject to adjustment by other participants who may present themselves as more knowledgeable on the subject matter or more entitled to provide opinions about it. The enclitic is used in reactive turns to indicate better epistemic access and higher authority in relation to a prior speaker, which may result in a disaligning action.

Notes