Difference between revisions of "Hakulinen2001"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Auli Hakulinen; |Title=Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions |Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Answer; Yes-no question; Conversation Anal...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Auli Hakulinen;  
+
|Author(s)=Auli Hakulinen;
 
|Title=Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions
 
|Title=Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Answer; Yes-no question; Conversation Analysis; Typology;  Grammar and context;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; IL; Answer; Yes-no question; Conversation Analysis; Typology;  Grammar and context;
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=11
 
|Volume=11
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=1-15
+
|Pages=1–15
|Abstract=Against the theoretical and methodological background of conversation analysis (CA), the author addresses the issue of the contextual conditions for a specific type of grammatical phenomenon: answers to yes-no questions. She distinguishes five kinds of answers: two minimal ones, one next to minimal one, and two sentential types of answers. Minimal and non-minimal types of answers are shown to be doing different kinds
+
|URL=https://www.jbe-platform.com/content/journals/10.1075/prag.11.1.01hak
of work in an interaction, full sentence answers addressing a wider range of features oriented to in the context either by the questioner or in the interpretation. The different types are placed along a confirmation-negation continuum.
+
|DOI=10.1075/prag.11.1.01hak
 +
|Abstract=Against the theoretical and methodological background of conversation analysis (CA), the author addresses the issue of the contextual conditions for a specific type of grammatical phenomenon: answers to yes-no questions. She distinguishes five kinds of answers: two minimal ones, one next to minimal one, and two sentential types of answers. Minimal and non-minimal types of answers are shown to be doing different kinds of work in an interaction, full sentence answers addressing a wider range of features oriented to in the context either by the questioner or in the interpretation. The different types are placed along a confirmation-negation continuum.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:30, 18 October 2019

Hakulinen2001
BibType ARTICLE
Key Hakulinen2001
Author(s) Auli Hakulinen
Title Minimal and non-minimal answers to yes-no questions
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, IL, Answer, Yes-no question, Conversation Analysis, Typology, Grammar and context
Publisher
Year 2001
Language
City
Month
Journal Pragmatics
Volume 11
Number 1
Pages 1–15
URL Link
DOI 10.1075/prag.11.1.01hak
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Against the theoretical and methodological background of conversation analysis (CA), the author addresses the issue of the contextual conditions for a specific type of grammatical phenomenon: answers to yes-no questions. She distinguishes five kinds of answers: two minimal ones, one next to minimal one, and two sentential types of answers. Minimal and non-minimal types of answers are shown to be doing different kinds of work in an interaction, full sentence answers addressing a wider range of features oriented to in the context either by the questioner or in the interpretation. The different types are placed along a confirmation-negation continuum.

Notes