Difference between revisions of "Stivers2008"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2014-07-12 01:20:23) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| + | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| + | |Author(s)=Tanya Stivers; | ||
| + | |Title=Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation | ||
| + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Stance; Alignment; Affiliation; Storytelling; Head Nods; Nodding; Embodiment; | ||
|Key=Stivers2008 | |Key=Stivers2008 | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Year=2008 | |Year=2008 | ||
| − | |||
|Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | |Journal=Research on Language and Social Interaction | ||
|Volume=41 | |Volume=41 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=31–57 | |Pages=31–57 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351810701691123 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1080/08351810701691123 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Through stories, tellers communicate their stance toward what they are reporting. Story recipients rely on different interactional resources to display alignment with the telling activity and affiliation with the teller's stance. In this article, I examine the communication resources participants to tellings rely on to manage displays of alignment and affiliation during the telling. The primary finding is that whereas vocal continuers simply align with the activity in progress, nods also claim access to the teller's stance toward the events (whether directly or indirectly). In mid-telling, when a recipient nods, she or he claims to have access to the teller's stance toward the event being reported, which in turn conveys preliminary affiliation with the teller's position and that the story is on track toward preferred uptake at story completion. Thus, the concepts of structural alignment and social affiliation are separate interactional issues and are managed by different response tokens in the mid-telling sequential environment. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 12:53, 24 November 2019
| Stivers2008 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Stivers2008 |
| Author(s) | Tanya Stivers |
| Title | Stance, alignment and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Stance, Alignment, Affiliation, Storytelling, Head Nods, Nodding, Embodiment |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 41 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31–57 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/08351810701691123 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Through stories, tellers communicate their stance toward what they are reporting. Story recipients rely on different interactional resources to display alignment with the telling activity and affiliation with the teller's stance. In this article, I examine the communication resources participants to tellings rely on to manage displays of alignment and affiliation during the telling. The primary finding is that whereas vocal continuers simply align with the activity in progress, nods also claim access to the teller's stance toward the events (whether directly or indirectly). In mid-telling, when a recipient nods, she or he claims to have access to the teller's stance toward the event being reported, which in turn conveys preliminary affiliation with the teller's position and that the story is on track toward preferred uptake at story completion. Thus, the concepts of structural alignment and social affiliation are separate interactional issues and are managed by different response tokens in the mid-telling sequential environment.
Notes
