Difference between revisions of "Naeslund2016"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Shirley Näslund |Title=Tacit tango: The social framework of screen-focused silence in institutional telephone calls |Tag(s)=EMC...")
 
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=91
 
|Volume=91
 
|Pages=60-79
 
|Pages=60-79
 +
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378216615003033
 +
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.008
 
|Abstract=This  study  examines  the  social  framework  of  screen-focused  silence  in  institutional  calls.  Calls  to  insurance  companies,  social  care
 
|Abstract=This  study  examines  the  social  framework  of  screen-focused  silence  in  institutional  calls.  Calls  to  insurance  companies,  social  care
 
centres  and  other  institutions  which  keep  computerised  documentation  are  likely  to  entail  moments  when  the  call-taker  has  to  focus  on  the
 
centres  and  other  institutions  which  keep  computerised  documentation  are  likely  to  entail  moments  when  the  call-taker  has  to  focus  on  the

Revision as of 12:04, 15 May 2016

Naeslund2016
BibType ARTICLE
Key Naeslund2016
Author(s) Shirley Näslund
Title Tacit tango: The social framework of screen-focused silence in institutional telephone calls
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Institutional call, Screen, Silence, Participant framework, Involvement, Transitions
Publisher
Year 2016
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Volume 91
Number
Pages 60-79
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.008
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This study examines the social framework of screen-focused silence in institutional calls. Calls to insurance companies, social care centres and other institutions which keep computerised documentation are likely to entail moments when the call-taker has to focus on the screen at the expense of interacting with the caller. This study examines how the transitions are organised between human--human-- screen interaction and human--screen interaction. The analysis shows that both call-taker and caller indicate clear agreement on the period when the call-taker will be temporarily out of contact, and that the latter delivers contextualisation cues at the beginning and end of the period of this screen-focused silence which contribute to a new set of expectations.

Notes