Difference between revisions of "Huhtamaeki2015"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Martina Huhtamäki |Title=The interactional function of prosody in repair initiation: Pitch height and timing of va ‘what’ i...")
 
m
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Author(s)=Martina Huhtamäki
 
|Author(s)=Martina Huhtamäki
|Title=The interactional function of prosody in repair initiation:
+
|Title=The interactional function of prosody in repair initiation: Pitch height and timing of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish
Pitch height and timing of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish
 
 
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Affective stance; Form; Function; Helsinki Swedish; Open-class repair; Prosody
 
|Tag(s)=Interactional Linguistics; Affective stance; Form; Function; Helsinki Swedish; Open-class repair; Prosody
 
|Key=Huhtamaeki2015
 
|Key=Huhtamaeki2015
Line 9: Line 8:
 
|Journal=Journal of Pramatics
 
|Journal=Journal of Pramatics
 
|Volume=90
 
|Volume=90
|Pages=48-66
+
|Pages=48–66
|Abstract=This paper analyzes the relation between the prosodic form and interactional function of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish interactions.
+
|URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821661500301X
The method adopted was sequential and phonetic analysis. The results show that prosodic features can display whether a va is used to
+
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.006
initiate normal repair or affective repair. Normal repair indicates a trouble in hearing or understanding, while affective repair
+
|Abstract=This paper analyzes the relation between the prosodic form and interactional function of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish interactions. The method adopted was sequential and phonetic analysis. The results show that prosodic features can display whether a va is used to initiate normal repair or affective repair. Normal repair indicates a trouble in hearing or understanding, while affective repair simultaneously initiates repair and displays an affective stance. The relevant prosodic features are the pitch span and range, as well as the temporal placement of turns. Contrary to claims by previous studies, pitch contour does not distinguish between trouble types in Helsinki Swedish. Furthermore, when participants ascribe functions to va-tokens, the other significant factors are sequential context, ongoing activity, and situation. As the results demonstrate that one form can be used for several functions and several forms can have one function, this study suggests that there is a one-to-many and many-to-one relationship between the prosodic form and interactional function of the va-turns in Helsinki Swedish.
simultaneously initiates repair and displays an affective stance. The relevant prosodic features are the pitch span and range, as well
 
as the temporal placement of turns. Contrary to claims by previous studies, pitch contour does not distinguish between trouble types in
 
Helsinki Swedish. Furthermore, when participants ascribe functions to va-tokens, the other significant factors are sequential context,
 
ongoing activity, and situation. As the results demonstrate that one form can be used for several functions and several forms can have one
 
function, this study suggests that there is a one-to-many and many-to-one relationship between the prosodic form and interactional
 
function of the va-turns in Helsinki Swedish.
 
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 17 March 2016

Huhtamaeki2015
BibType ARTICLE
Key Huhtamaeki2015
Author(s) Martina Huhtamäki
Title The interactional function of prosody in repair initiation: Pitch height and timing of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish
Editor(s)
Tag(s) Interactional Linguistics, Affective stance, Form, Function, Helsinki Swedish, Open-class repair, Prosody
Publisher
Year 2015
Language
City
Month
Journal Journal of Pramatics
Volume 90
Number
Pages 48–66
URL Link
DOI 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.10.006
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This paper analyzes the relation between the prosodic form and interactional function of va ‘what’ in Helsinki Swedish interactions. The method adopted was sequential and phonetic analysis. The results show that prosodic features can display whether a va is used to initiate normal repair or affective repair. Normal repair indicates a trouble in hearing or understanding, while affective repair simultaneously initiates repair and displays an affective stance. The relevant prosodic features are the pitch span and range, as well as the temporal placement of turns. Contrary to claims by previous studies, pitch contour does not distinguish between trouble types in Helsinki Swedish. Furthermore, when participants ascribe functions to va-tokens, the other significant factors are sequential context, ongoing activity, and situation. As the results demonstrate that one form can be used for several functions and several forms can have one function, this study suggests that there is a one-to-many and many-to-one relationship between the prosodic form and interactional function of the va-turns in Helsinki Swedish.

Notes