Difference between revisions of "Heritage2012b"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=John Heritage; |Title=Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; |Key=Heritage2012b...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=John Heritage; | + | |Author(s)=John Heritage; |
|Title=Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge | |Title=Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge | ||
− | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Epistemics; Knowledge; |
|Key=Heritage2012b | |Key=Heritage2012b | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=45 | |Volume=45 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Pages=1–29 |
+ | |URL=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 | ||
+ | |Abstract=This article considers the role of grammatical form in the construction of social action, focusing on turns that either assert or request information. It is argued that the epistemic status of a speaker consistently takes precedence over a turn's morphosyntactically displayed epistemic stance in the constitution of the action a turn is implementing. Insofar as asserting or requesting information is a fundamental underlying feature of many classes of social action, consideration of the (relative) epistemic statuses of the speaker and hearer are a fundamental and unavoidable element in the construction of social action. A range of examples illustrate patterns of convergence and divergence in the relation between epistemic status and epistemic stance. | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:34, 25 February 2016
Heritage2012b | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Heritage2012b |
Author(s) | John Heritage |
Title | Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Epistemics, Knowledge |
Publisher | |
Year | 2012 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Research on Language and Social Interaction |
Volume | 45 |
Number | 1 |
Pages | 1–29 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article considers the role of grammatical form in the construction of social action, focusing on turns that either assert or request information. It is argued that the epistemic status of a speaker consistently takes precedence over a turn's morphosyntactically displayed epistemic stance in the constitution of the action a turn is implementing. Insofar as asserting or requesting information is a fundamental underlying feature of many classes of social action, consideration of the (relative) epistemic statuses of the speaker and hearer are a fundamental and unavoidable element in the construction of social action. A range of examples illustrate patterns of convergence and divergence in the relation between epistemic status and epistemic stance.
Notes