Difference between revisions of "Iversen2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Clara Iversen |Title=Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; Chi...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Clara Iversen | |Author(s)=Clara Iversen | ||
|Title=Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children | |Title=Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children | ||
− | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; Children; Institutional interaction; | + | |Tag(s)=Discursive Psychology; Children; Institutional interaction; |
|Key=Iversen2012 | |Key=Iversen2012 | ||
|Year=2012 | |Year=2012 | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Volume=14 | |Volume=14 | ||
|Number=6 | |Number=6 | ||
− | |Pages=691 | + | |Pages=691–709 |
+ | |URL=http://dis.sagepub.com/content/14/6/691 | ||
+ | |DOI=10.1177/1461445612456997 | ||
+ | |Abstract=Different areas of child welfare work call for psychometric measurement to replace professionals’ judgements with objective numbers. Using data from a national Swedish evaluation of interventions for abused children, the present article investigates child interviewees’ resistance to constraints in psychometric questions. The article contributes to studies of how psychology operates in institutional settings; it looks into the discursive production of the interviewee’s position in the struggle between the principle of recordability and ‘sensitive’ interviewing. The findings suggest that interviewees resist questions’ structural restrictions in the service of telling the interviewer about their lives. Thus, the function of their misalignment is affiliative; it cooperates both with the institutional goal of eliciting information and with the interviewer’s interest in them. However, the interviewer’s solutions to children’s problem presentations remain focused on generating recordable answers. The article concludes that the narrow focus on recordability neglects important opportunities to talk about children’s experiences. | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 14:24, 25 February 2016
Iversen2012 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Iversen2012 |
Author(s) | Clara Iversen |
Title | Recordability: Resistance and collusion in psychometric interviews with children |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | Discursive Psychology, Children, Institutional interaction |
Publisher | |
Year | 2012 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 14 |
Number | 6 |
Pages | 691–709 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445612456997 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Different areas of child welfare work call for psychometric measurement to replace professionals’ judgements with objective numbers. Using data from a national Swedish evaluation of interventions for abused children, the present article investigates child interviewees’ resistance to constraints in psychometric questions. The article contributes to studies of how psychology operates in institutional settings; it looks into the discursive production of the interviewee’s position in the struggle between the principle of recordability and ‘sensitive’ interviewing. The findings suggest that interviewees resist questions’ structural restrictions in the service of telling the interviewer about their lives. Thus, the function of their misalignment is affiliative; it cooperates both with the institutional goal of eliciting information and with the interviewer’s interest in them. However, the interviewer’s solutions to children’s problem presentations remain focused on generating recordable answers. The article concludes that the narrow focus on recordability neglects important opportunities to talk about children’s experiences.
Notes