Difference between revisions of "Pollner2012c"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Melvin Pollner; |Title=Reflections on Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’s Program |Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Melvin Pollner; Garfin...")
 
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Author(s)=Melvin Pollner;  
+
|Author(s)=Melvin Pollner;
 
|Title=Reflections on Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’s Program
 
|Title=Reflections on Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’s Program
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Melvin Pollner; Garfinkel;  
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Ethnomethodology; Melvin Pollner; Garfinkel;
 
|Key=Pollner2012c
 
|Key=Pollner2012c
 
|Year=2012
 
|Year=2012
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Volume=43
 
|Volume=43
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1
|Pages=36-54
+
|Pages=36–54
 +
|URL=http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs12108-011-9146-x
 +
|DOI=10.1007/s12108-011-9146-x
 +
|Abstract=Ethnomethodology’s Program, published in 2002, presents Garfinkel’s most recent statements on ethnomethodology and its central concerns, assumptions and procedures. This article reflects on biographical influences that have shaped Garfinkel’s thinking, differences between this work and his earlier statements of ethnomethodology, the deliberate elusiveness of his writings, the connections between ethnomethodology and classical sociology, and under-appreciated parallels between ethnomethodogy and current critiques of rationalization and modernity.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 13:14, 24 February 2016

Pollner2012c
BibType ARTICLE
Key Pollner2012c
Author(s) Melvin Pollner
Title Reflections on Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology’s Program
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Ethnomethodology, Melvin Pollner, Garfinkel
Publisher
Year 2012
Language
City
Month
Journal The American Sociologist
Volume 43
Number 1
Pages 36–54
URL Link
DOI 10.1007/s12108-011-9146-x
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Ethnomethodology’s Program, published in 2002, presents Garfinkel’s most recent statements on ethnomethodology and its central concerns, assumptions and procedures. This article reflects on biographical influences that have shaped Garfinkel’s thinking, differences between this work and his earlier statements of ethnomethodology, the deliberate elusiveness of his writings, the connections between ethnomethodology and classical sociology, and under-appreciated parallels between ethnomethodogy and current critiques of rationalization and modernity.

Notes