Difference between revisions of "Goffman1983"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Erving Goffman | |Author(s)=Erving Goffman | ||
|Title=Felicity's condition | |Title=Felicity's condition | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=Related Interaction Studies; | + | |Tag(s)=Related Interaction Studies; |
|Key=Goffman1983 | |Key=Goffman1983 | ||
|Year=1983 | |Year=1983 | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=1–53 | |Pages=1–53 | ||
| + | |URL=http://www.jstor.org/stable/2779047 | ||
| + | |Abstract=In this paper an effort is made to review the relevance and limitations of a scattering of near-recent work in sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and conversational analysis with respect to a central issue in the sociological study of social interaction: the taken-for-granted and the inferences made therefrom. The hope is that the line between microsociological studies and sociolinguistics can be shown to be arbitrary, requiring those on each side of the division to address the concerns of those on the other side. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 06:54, 13 February 2016
| Goffman1983 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Goffman1983 |
| Author(s) | Erving Goffman |
| Title | Felicity's condition |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Related Interaction Studies |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 1983 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | American Journal of Sociology |
| Volume | 89 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 1–53 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this paper an effort is made to review the relevance and limitations of a scattering of near-recent work in sociolinguistics, pragmatics, and conversational analysis with respect to a central issue in the sociological study of social interaction: the taken-for-granted and the inferences made therefrom. The hope is that the line between microsociological studies and sociolinguistics can be shown to be arbitrary, requiring those on each side of the division to address the concerns of those on the other side.
Notes
