Difference between revisions of "Greiffenhagen2008a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Christian Greiffenhagen |Title=Video Analysis of Mathematical Practice? Different Attempts to "Open Up" Mathematics for Sociological Inv...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 06:19, 7 February 2016
| Greiffenhagen2008a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Greiffenhagen2008a |
| Author(s) | Christian Greiffenhagen |
| Title | Video Analysis of Mathematical Practice? Different Attempts to "Open Up" Mathematics for Sociological Investigation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, video analysis, workplace studies, sociology of scientific knowledge, mathematics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2008 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In this article I argue that in contrast to a large number of sociological studies of laboratory practices in the natural sciences, there have been relatively few studies that have investigated professional mathematical practice. I discuss three different methodological attempts to "open up" advanced mathematics for sociological investigation: (1) LIVINGSTON's "demonstrative sociology"; (2) MERZ and KNORR-CETINA's "e-mail ethnography"; and (3) my own "video ethnography."
Notes
