Difference between revisions of "Oak2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Arlene Oak |Title=‘You can argue it two ways’: The collaborative management of a design dilemma |Tag(s)=EMCA collaborative design; C...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Design Studies | |Journal=Design Studies | ||
|Volume=33 | |Volume=33 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Number=6 |
| − | |Abstract=This paper uses aspects of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to | + | |Pages=630–648 |
| − | consider talk from a meeting that occurred in a university course on ‘universal’ | + | |URL=http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142694X12000439 |
| − | design. The focus is on how participants manage a practical and moral dilemma: | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.006 |
| − | how might they design a product that meets the needs of a wide population and | + | |Abstract=This paper uses aspects of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to consider talk from a meeting that occurred in a university course on ‘universal’ design. The focus is on how participants manage a practical and moral dilemma: how might they design a product that meets the needs of a wide population and the needs of a particular client? Resolving this dilemma has consequences for both who the product is aimed at and how it will function. Through the analysis and discussion of an extract of talk, this paper investigates precisely how this practical and moral dilemma of design is carefully managed and resolved through the collaborative social interactions of practice. |
| − | the needs of a particular client? Resolving this dilemma has consequences for | ||
| − | both who the product is aimed at and how it will function. Through the analysis | ||
| − | and discussion of an extract of talk, this paper investigates precisely how this | ||
| − | practical and moral dilemma of design is carefully managed and resolved | ||
| − | through the collaborative social interactions of practice. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:05, 20 January 2016
| Oak2012 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Oak2012 |
| Author(s) | Arlene Oak |
| Title | ‘You can argue it two ways’: The collaborative management of a design dilemma |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA collaborative design, Conversation Analysis, design practice, Ethnomethodology, moral and practical dilemma |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2012 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Design Studies |
| Volume | 33 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 630–648 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.destud.2012.06.006 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper uses aspects of Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis to consider talk from a meeting that occurred in a university course on ‘universal’ design. The focus is on how participants manage a practical and moral dilemma: how might they design a product that meets the needs of a wide population and the needs of a particular client? Resolving this dilemma has consequences for both who the product is aimed at and how it will function. Through the analysis and discussion of an extract of talk, this paper investigates precisely how this practical and moral dilemma of design is carefully managed and resolved through the collaborative social interactions of practice.
Notes
