Difference between revisions of "Kim2015"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2015-02-27 12:32:39) |
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Stephanie Hyeri Kim; |
|Title=Resisting the Terms of Polar Questions Through Ani (‘No’)-Prefacing in Korean Conversation | |Title=Resisting the Terms of Polar Questions Through Ani (‘No’)-Prefacing in Korean Conversation | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Polar Questions; Korean; Needs Review | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Polar Questions; Korean; Needs Review | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Kim2015 |
|Year=2014 | |Year=2014 | ||
|Journal=Discourse Processes | |Journal=Discourse Processes | ||
|Volume=In press | |Volume=In press | ||
| − | |||
|Pages=1-24 | |Pages=1-24 | ||
|URL=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 | |URL=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 | ||
|DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 | |DOI=10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 | ||
| − | |Abstract=This article reports on the conversation-analytic investigation of ani (‘No’)-prefaced responses to polar questions in Korean conversation, when ani is not used as a negative response particle to negate or disconfirm the truth conditional proposition of the question. Understanding polar questions as advancing the questioner's hypothesis for confirmation, the article demonstrates that the ani-preface in the responsive turn resists (1) the polar question's presupposition that the hypothesis is confirmable and (2) the framing of the proposed hypothesis. Overall, the study rediscovers ani | + | |Abstract=This article reports on the conversation-analytic investigation of ani (‘No’)-prefaced responses to polar questions in Korean conversation, when ani is not used as a negative response particle to negate or disconfirm the truth conditional proposition of the question. Understanding polar questions as advancing the questioner's hypothesis for confirmation, the article demonstrates that the ani-preface in the responsive turn resists (1) the polar question's presupposition that the hypothesis is confirmable and (2) the framing of the proposed hypothesis. Overall, the study rediscovers ani 'no' as a turn-beginning particle that indexes the respondent's resistance to responding to the question as framed and further discusses the token's 'positionally sensitive' character by discussing cases of ani-prefaced turns that occur in response to wh-questions. |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 04:33, 27 February 2015
| Kim2015 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kim2015 |
| Author(s) | Stephanie Hyeri Kim |
| Title | Resisting the Terms of Polar Questions Through Ani (‘No’)-Prefacing in Korean Conversation |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Polar Questions, Korean, Needs Review |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2014 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Processes |
| Volume | In press |
| Number | |
| Pages | 1-24 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1080/0163853X.2014.954950 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article reports on the conversation-analytic investigation of ani (‘No’)-prefaced responses to polar questions in Korean conversation, when ani is not used as a negative response particle to negate or disconfirm the truth conditional proposition of the question. Understanding polar questions as advancing the questioner's hypothesis for confirmation, the article demonstrates that the ani-preface in the responsive turn resists (1) the polar question's presupposition that the hypothesis is confirmable and (2) the framing of the proposed hypothesis. Overall, the study rediscovers ani 'no' as a turn-beginning particle that indexes the respondent's resistance to responding to the question as framed and further discusses the token's 'positionally sensitive' character by discussing cases of ani-prefaced turns that occur in response to wh-questions.
Notes
