Difference between revisions of "Albert2024"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Saul Albert; Lauren Hall |Title=Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study |Tag(s)=EMCA; In p...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Saul Albert; Lauren Hall
 
|Author(s)=Saul Albert; Lauren Hall
 
|Title=Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study
 
|Title=Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study
|Tag(s)=EMCA; In press; Homecare; Voice user interface; AI Reference List
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Homecare; Voice user interface; AI Reference List
 
|Key=Albert2024
 
|Key=Albert2024
 
|Year=2024
 
|Year=2024
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse & Communication
 
|Journal=Discourse & Communication
 +
|Volume=18
 +
|Number=6
 +
|Pages=892–904
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17504813241267059
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17504813241267059
 
|DOI=10.1177/17504813241267059
 
|DOI=10.1177/17504813241267059
 
|Abstract=The agent of action in Human-Computer Interaction is, as the hyphenated name of the field suggests, usually conceptualized as an contrastive binary of either human or computer. This study, informed by ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, instead describes the interactional achievement of distributed agency in a ‘smart homecare’ setting where a homecare worker and a disabled person coordinate shared activities using a virtual assistant. We focus on the tacit criteria, attributions, and discourses of agency embedded in the interactional details of their everyday homecare routine. The analyses reveal how collaboration in everyday care tasks involves the distributed agency of all participants, irrespective of their ostensible ‘humanness’. Our findings (a) provide a critical perspective on the technological imaginary of expensive, high-tech robotic replacements for human care work; (b) advocate low-tech strategies for adapting consumer technology for smart homecare systems; and (c) suggest alternative approaches to agency in assistive technology design, grounded in detailed observation of the interactional infrastructure of real homecare settings.
 
|Abstract=The agent of action in Human-Computer Interaction is, as the hyphenated name of the field suggests, usually conceptualized as an contrastive binary of either human or computer. This study, informed by ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, instead describes the interactional achievement of distributed agency in a ‘smart homecare’ setting where a homecare worker and a disabled person coordinate shared activities using a virtual assistant. We focus on the tacit criteria, attributions, and discourses of agency embedded in the interactional details of their everyday homecare routine. The analyses reveal how collaboration in everyday care tasks involves the distributed agency of all participants, irrespective of their ostensible ‘humanness’. Our findings (a) provide a critical perspective on the technological imaginary of expensive, high-tech robotic replacements for human care work; (b) advocate low-tech strategies for adapting consumer technology for smart homecare systems; and (c) suggest alternative approaches to agency in assistive technology design, grounded in detailed observation of the interactional infrastructure of real homecare settings.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:46, 8 November 2024

Albert2024
BibType ARTICLE
Key Albert2024
Author(s) Saul Albert, Lauren Hall
Title Distributed agency in smart homecare interactions: A conversation analytic case study
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Homecare, Voice user interface, AI Reference List
Publisher
Year 2024
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse & Communication
Volume 18
Number 6
Pages 892–904
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/17504813241267059
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The agent of action in Human-Computer Interaction is, as the hyphenated name of the field suggests, usually conceptualized as an contrastive binary of either human or computer. This study, informed by ethnomethodology and conversation analysis, instead describes the interactional achievement of distributed agency in a ‘smart homecare’ setting where a homecare worker and a disabled person coordinate shared activities using a virtual assistant. We focus on the tacit criteria, attributions, and discourses of agency embedded in the interactional details of their everyday homecare routine. The analyses reveal how collaboration in everyday care tasks involves the distributed agency of all participants, irrespective of their ostensible ‘humanness’. Our findings (a) provide a critical perspective on the technological imaginary of expensive, high-tech robotic replacements for human care work; (b) advocate low-tech strategies for adapting consumer technology for smart homecare systems; and (c) suggest alternative approaches to agency in assistive technology design, grounded in detailed observation of the interactional infrastructure of real homecare settings.

Notes