Difference between revisions of "Blythe2024"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Fakry Hamdani; Scott Barnes |Title=Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations |T...")
 
m (AndreiKorbut moved page Blythe2023 to Blythe2024 without leaving a redirect)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Fakry Hamdani; Scott Barnes
 
|Author(s)=Joe Blythe; Fakry Hamdani; Scott Barnes
 
|Title=Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations
 
|Title=Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Touch; Multimodality; Sociotopography; In press
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Turn-taking; Touch; Multimodality; Sociotopography
|Key=Blythe2023
+
|Key=Blythe2024
|Year=2023
+
|Year=2024
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 
|Journal=Language in Society
 +
|Volume=53
 +
|Number=4
 +
|Pages=671–705
 
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/tactile-engagement-of-prospective-next-speakers-in-indonesian-multiparty-conversations/E77E1EF41A3F1E2CEE45A1FD02FAA3DD
 
|URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-in-society/article/tactile-engagement-of-prospective-next-speakers-in-indonesian-multiparty-conversations/E77E1EF41A3F1E2CEE45A1FD02FAA3DD
 
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404523000441
 
|DOI=10.1017/S0047404523000441
 
|Abstract=This article investigates the use of touch as a tool for engaging prospective next speakers within Indonesian multiparty conversation. We examine the lamination of touch onto questions directed towards specifically targeted recipients. First, we find that questions with touch are deployed when the physical environment complicates the attainment of mutual orientation. Second, when previously targeted recipients have failed to respond to a question, touch is added to follow-up questions that are deployed for pursuing a response. Third, touch is added to questions that are personal or that inquire about potentially delicate matters. This multimodal investigation of conversational turn-taking provides data from Colloquial Indonesian as basis for cross-linguistic comparison. In considering the volume of touches in these data we ask whether cultural and environmental factors might contribute to a haptic modification of ordinary turn-taking procedures.
 
|Abstract=This article investigates the use of touch as a tool for engaging prospective next speakers within Indonesian multiparty conversation. We examine the lamination of touch onto questions directed towards specifically targeted recipients. First, we find that questions with touch are deployed when the physical environment complicates the attainment of mutual orientation. Second, when previously targeted recipients have failed to respond to a question, touch is added to follow-up questions that are deployed for pursuing a response. Third, touch is added to questions that are personal or that inquire about potentially delicate matters. This multimodal investigation of conversational turn-taking provides data from Colloquial Indonesian as basis for cross-linguistic comparison. In considering the volume of touches in these data we ask whether cultural and environmental factors might contribute to a haptic modification of ordinary turn-taking procedures.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 07:45, 8 November 2024

Blythe2024
BibType ARTICLE
Key Blythe2024
Author(s) Joe Blythe, Fakry Hamdani, Scott Barnes
Title Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Turn-taking, Touch, Multimodality, Sociotopography
Publisher
Year 2024
Language English
City
Month
Journal Language in Society
Volume 53
Number 4
Pages 671–705
URL Link
DOI 10.1017/S0047404523000441
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article investigates the use of touch as a tool for engaging prospective next speakers within Indonesian multiparty conversation. We examine the lamination of touch onto questions directed towards specifically targeted recipients. First, we find that questions with touch are deployed when the physical environment complicates the attainment of mutual orientation. Second, when previously targeted recipients have failed to respond to a question, touch is added to follow-up questions that are deployed for pursuing a response. Third, touch is added to questions that are personal or that inquire about potentially delicate matters. This multimodal investigation of conversational turn-taking provides data from Colloquial Indonesian as basis for cross-linguistic comparison. In considering the volume of touches in these data we ask whether cultural and environmental factors might contribute to a haptic modification of ordinary turn-taking procedures.

Notes