Difference between revisions of "Satti2024"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (AndreiKorbut moved page Satti2023a to Satti2024 without leaving a redirect)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Ignacio Satti;
 
|Author(s)=Ignacio Satti;
 
|Title=Requests for Verification across Varieties of Spanish: A Comparative Approach to Gaze Behaviour
 
|Title=Requests for Verification across Varieties of Spanish: A Comparative Approach to Gaze Behaviour
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Pragmatic typology; Multimodal interaction; Conversation; Spanish
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Gaze; Pragmatic typology; Multimodal interaction; Conversation; Spanish; In Press
 
|Key=Satti2024
 
|Key=Satti2024
 
|Year=2024
 
|Year=2024
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Contrastive Pragmatics
 
|Journal=Contrastive Pragmatics
|Volume=39
 
|Number=4
 
|Pages=1795–1810
 
 
|URL=https://brill.com/view/journals/jocp/aop/article-10.1163-26660393-bja10092/article-10.1163-26660393-bja10092.xml
 
|URL=https://brill.com/view/journals/jocp/aop/article-10.1163-26660393-bja10092/article-10.1163-26660393-bja10092.xml
 
|DOI=10.1163/26660393-bja10092
 
|DOI=10.1163/26660393-bja10092
 
|Abstract=This article examines requests for verification across varieties of Spanish. It focuses on the role of gaze behaviour in the design of the request and shows how gaze is interrelated with other resources, such as facial expressions, epistemic markers, prosody and tag questions. By comparing speakers from Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia and Ecuador, the article finds similarities but also differences between the groups of speakers. The speakers from Bolivia and Ecuador rarely establish mutual gaze or use facial expressions during the verification sequence. Instead, more frequently, they deploy other resources for obtaining verifications, such as tag questions, hand gestures and rising intonation. The article considers differences in gaze behaviour within the larger machinery of response mobilisation and shows how gaze is intertwined with other aspects of conversational organisation. Results are based on qualitative and quantitative analysis. The data stems from face-to-face conversations recorded in similar side-by-side settings.
 
|Abstract=This article examines requests for verification across varieties of Spanish. It focuses on the role of gaze behaviour in the design of the request and shows how gaze is interrelated with other resources, such as facial expressions, epistemic markers, prosody and tag questions. By comparing speakers from Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia and Ecuador, the article finds similarities but also differences between the groups of speakers. The speakers from Bolivia and Ecuador rarely establish mutual gaze or use facial expressions during the verification sequence. Instead, more frequently, they deploy other resources for obtaining verifications, such as tag questions, hand gestures and rising intonation. The article considers differences in gaze behaviour within the larger machinery of response mobilisation and shows how gaze is intertwined with other aspects of conversational organisation. Results are based on qualitative and quantitative analysis. The data stems from face-to-face conversations recorded in similar side-by-side settings.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 03:19, 19 August 2024

Satti2024
BibType ARTICLE
Key Satti2024
Author(s) Ignacio Satti
Title Requests for Verification across Varieties of Spanish: A Comparative Approach to Gaze Behaviour
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Gaze, Pragmatic typology, Multimodal interaction, Conversation, Spanish, In Press
Publisher
Year 2024
Language English
City
Month
Journal Contrastive Pragmatics
Volume
Number
Pages
URL Link
DOI 10.1163/26660393-bja10092
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

This article examines requests for verification across varieties of Spanish. It focuses on the role of gaze behaviour in the design of the request and shows how gaze is interrelated with other resources, such as facial expressions, epistemic markers, prosody and tag questions. By comparing speakers from Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia and Ecuador, the article finds similarities but also differences between the groups of speakers. The speakers from Bolivia and Ecuador rarely establish mutual gaze or use facial expressions during the verification sequence. Instead, more frequently, they deploy other resources for obtaining verifications, such as tag questions, hand gestures and rising intonation. The article considers differences in gaze behaviour within the larger machinery of response mobilisation and shows how gaze is intertwined with other aspects of conversational organisation. Results are based on qualitative and quantitative analysis. The data stems from face-to-face conversations recorded in similar side-by-side settings.

Notes