Difference between revisions of "International Winter School 2025"
(Created page with "{{Announcement |Announcement Type=Training, Workshop |Full title=International Winter School 2025: Points of departure in Conversation Analysis and Interactional Linguistics:...") |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Short title=International Winter | |Short title=International Winter | ||
|Short summary=Call for applications: Apply for the International Winter School 2025 on 'Points of departure in CA and IL', 17-19 Feb 2025, Mannheim (GER)! More info: https://www.ids-mannheim.de/aktuell/veranstaltungen/kolloquien/2025/international-winter-school | |Short summary=Call for applications: Apply for the International Winter School 2025 on 'Points of departure in CA and IL', 17-19 Feb 2025, Mannheim (GER)! More info: https://www.ids-mannheim.de/aktuell/veranstaltungen/kolloquien/2025/international-winter-school | ||
| − | |Announcement text='''Organizers:''' | + | |Announcement text='''Organizers:''' Alexandra Gubina and Uwe-Alexander Küttner (Pragmatics Department, Leibniz-Institute for the German Language, Mannheim) |
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Jörg Zinken (IDS Mannheim) | Jörg Zinken (IDS Mannheim) | ||
| + | |||
'''Venue:''' Leibniz-Institute for the German Language, Mannheim | '''Venue:''' Leibniz-Institute for the German Language, Mannheim | ||
| + | |||
'''Date(s):''' 17-19 February, 2025 | '''Date(s):''' 17-19 February, 2025 | ||
| + | |||
'''Number of participants:''' max. 30 participants | '''Number of participants:''' max. 30 participants | ||
| + | |||
There are various analytic pathways for research within Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL): One can start with a specific '''social action''' and focus, e.g., on how that specific action can be accomplished in a particular language or across different languages. Commonly, such inquiries begin with actions like requests (e.g., Curl and Drew 2008; Drew and Couper-Kuhlen 2014; Fox and Heinemann 2016, 2017; Gubina 2021; Rossi 2012; Zinken 2016), offers (e.g., Curl 2006; Mandelbaum & Lerner 2023; Mondada 2023; Raymond et al. 2021), proposals (e.g., Thompson et al. 2021), and assessments (e.g., Thompson et al. 2015), to mention just a few. Another common strategy is to begin with a '''(linguistic) form''' (Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 2001, 2018; Fox 2007), i.e., a recurrent (semi-)linguistic format on different levels of granularity used for accomplishing specific social actions in interaction. Studies focusing on social action formats usually examine various actions that can be carried out with a specific linguistic form (e.g., Betz 2008; Betz et al. 2021; Couper-Kuhlen 2014; Deppermann and Gubina 2021; Gubina 2022; Hoey 2022; Pekarek Doehler 2019; Rossi and Zinken 2016; Raymond 2017). Studies may also begin '''elsewhere''', including, e.g., starting with some interactional "task" or "problem" (like in the field of recruitments; Floyd et al. 2020; Kendrick/Drew 2016), the negotiation of deontic rights (Stevanovic 2013), or the use of embodied resources, such as gaze (Rossano 2012) or facial expressions (Groß et al. 2024; Kaukomaa et al. 2014) - again, to name just a few. | There are various analytic pathways for research within Conversation Analysis (CA) and Interactional Linguistics (IL): One can start with a specific '''social action''' and focus, e.g., on how that specific action can be accomplished in a particular language or across different languages. Commonly, such inquiries begin with actions like requests (e.g., Curl and Drew 2008; Drew and Couper-Kuhlen 2014; Fox and Heinemann 2016, 2017; Gubina 2021; Rossi 2012; Zinken 2016), offers (e.g., Curl 2006; Mandelbaum & Lerner 2023; Mondada 2023; Raymond et al. 2021), proposals (e.g., Thompson et al. 2021), and assessments (e.g., Thompson et al. 2015), to mention just a few. Another common strategy is to begin with a '''(linguistic) form''' (Couper-Kuhlen & Selting 2001, 2018; Fox 2007), i.e., a recurrent (semi-)linguistic format on different levels of granularity used for accomplishing specific social actions in interaction. Studies focusing on social action formats usually examine various actions that can be carried out with a specific linguistic form (e.g., Betz 2008; Betz et al. 2021; Couper-Kuhlen 2014; Deppermann and Gubina 2021; Gubina 2022; Hoey 2022; Pekarek Doehler 2019; Rossi and Zinken 2016; Raymond 2017). Studies may also begin '''elsewhere''', including, e.g., starting with some interactional "task" or "problem" (like in the field of recruitments; Floyd et al. 2020; Kendrick/Drew 2016), the negotiation of deontic rights (Stevanovic 2013), or the use of embodied resources, such as gaze (Rossano 2012) or facial expressions (Groß et al. 2024; Kaukomaa et al. 2014) - again, to name just a few. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
Here you will find a report by Carolina Fenner, Galina Gostrer, Lydia Heiden, Taiane Malabarba, and Sam Schirm on the first International Summer Institute for Interactional Linguistics 2022 at the IDS Mannheim: | Here you will find a report by Carolina Fenner, Galina Gostrer, Lydia Heiden, Taiane Malabarba, and Sam Schirm on the first International Summer Institute for Interactional Linguistics 2022 at the IDS Mannheim: | ||
'''http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2022/tb-interactional-linguistics.pdf''' | '''http://www.gespraechsforschung-online.de/fileadmin/dateien/heft2022/tb-interactional-linguistics.pdf''' | ||
| + | |||
'''References:''' | '''References:''' | ||
