Difference between revisions of "Umair2022"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2024-07-02 07:11:17)
 
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|Year=2022
 
|Year=2022
 
|Month=apr
 
|Month=apr
|Journal=Dialogue \& Discourse
+
|Journal=Dialogue & Discourse
 
|Volume=13
 
|Volume=13
 
|Number=1
 
|Number=1

Latest revision as of 06:12, 2 July 2024

Umair2022
BibType ARTICLE
Key Umair2022
Author(s) Muhammad Umair, Julia Beret Mertens, Saul Albert, J. P. de Ruiter
Title GailBot: An automatic transcription system for Conversation Analysis
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Transcription, Jeffersonian, Technology, NLP, ASR, Tools
Publisher
Year 2022
Language
City
Month apr
Journal Dialogue & Discourse
Volume 13
Number 1
Pages 63–95
URL Link
DOI 10.5210/dad.2022.103
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Researchers studying human interaction, such as conversation analysts, psychologists, and linguists, all rely on detailed transcriptions of language use. Ideally, these should include so-called paralinguistic features of talk, such as overlaps, prosody, and intonation, as they convey important information. However, creating conversational transcripts that include these features by hand requires substantial amounts of time by trained transcribers. There are currently no Speech to Text (STT) systems that are able to integrate these features in the generated transcript. To reduce the resources needed to create detailed conversation transcripts that include representation of paralinguistic features, we developed a program called GailBot. GailBot combines STT services with plugins to automatically generate first drafts of transcripts that largely follow the transcription standards common in the field of Conversation Analysis. It also enables researchers to add new plugins to transcribe additional features, or to improve the plugins it currently uses. We describe GailBot’s architecture and its use of computational heuristics and machine learning. We also evaluate its output in relation to transcripts produced by both human transcribers and comparable automated transcription systems. We argue that despite its limitations, GailBot represents a substantial improvement over existing dialogue transcription software.

Notes

Number: 1