Difference between revisions of "Chalfoun2024"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2024-05-10 04:17:00) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 04:17, 10 May 2024
| Chalfoun2024 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Chalfoun2024 |
| Author(s) | Andrew Chalfoun, Giovanni Rossi, Tanya Stivers |
| Title | The Magic Word? Face-Work and the Functions of Please in Everyday Requests |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | Requests, Please, Politeness, EMCA, Request, Face, Face-work |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2024 |
| Language | |
| City | |
| Month | may |
| Journal | Social Psychology Quarterly |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 01902725241245141 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/01902725241245141 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Expressions of politeness such as please are prominent elements of interactional conduct that are explicitly targeted in early socialization and are subject to cultural expectations around socially desirable behavior. Yet their specific interactional functions remain poorly understood. Using conversation analysis supplemented with systematic coding, this study investigates when and where interactants use please in everyday requests. We find that please is rare, occurring in only 7 percent of request attempts. Interactants use please to manage face-threats when a request is ill fitted to its immediate interactional context. Within this, we identify two environments in which please prototypically occurs. First, please is used when the requestee has demonstrated unwillingness to comply. Second, please is used when the request is intrusive due to its incompatibility with the requestee’s engagement in a competing action trajectory. Our findings advance research on politeness and extend Goffman’s theory of face-work, with particular salience for scholarship on request behavior.
Notes
Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc
