Difference between revisions of "Gubina/Betz 2021"
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Alexandra Gubina; Emma Betz; |Title=What Do Newsmark-Type Responses Invite? The Response Space After German echt |Tag(s)=EMCA; newsmark;...") |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Alexandra Gubina; Emma Betz; | |Author(s)=Alexandra Gubina; Emma Betz; | ||
|Title=What Do Newsmark-Type Responses Invite? The Response Space After German echt | |Title=What Do Newsmark-Type Responses Invite? The Response Space After German echt | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Newsmark; Response space; Response; Account; Reconfirmation; Elaboration; Request for confirmation; Acceptability; Challenge; News marking |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=GubinaBetz2021 |
|Year=2021 | |Year=2021 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=4 | |Number=4 | ||
|Pages=374-396 | |Pages=374-396 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08351813.2021.1974745 | ||
| + | |Abstract=This conversation analytic study examines responsive echt (“really”), which is commonly associated with “newsmarks,” in co-present German interaction. Across uses, echt-turns are a practice for topicalizing, however briefly, something in another participant’s just-prior turn. But this topicalization shapes the response space in systematically different ways: Echt-turns can be taken to (a) invite simple reconfirmation, (b) invite topical elaboration, or | ||
| + | (c) solicit an account either to reconcile diverging expectations or to manage problems in acceptability. We demonstrate how both the design of echt-turns and participants’ epistemic positioning matter to how echt-turns are treated and shape interactional trajectories. By using the notion of “inviting” a next action, we highlight the importance of conceptualizing response relevance after second-position actions, and specifically after “newsmark-type” responses, as a gradient. Data are taken from everyday and institutional interaction and presented in German with English translations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 04:12, 25 February 2024
| Gubina/Betz 2021 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | GubinaBetz2021 |
| Author(s) | Alexandra Gubina, Emma Betz |
| Title | What Do Newsmark-Type Responses Invite? The Response Space After German echt |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Newsmark, Response space, Response, Account, Reconfirmation, Elaboration, Request for confirmation, Acceptability, Challenge, News marking |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Research On Language and Social Interaction |
| Volume | 54 |
| Number | 4 |
| Pages | 374-396 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This conversation analytic study examines responsive echt (“really”), which is commonly associated with “newsmarks,” in co-present German interaction. Across uses, echt-turns are a practice for topicalizing, however briefly, something in another participant’s just-prior turn. But this topicalization shapes the response space in systematically different ways: Echt-turns can be taken to (a) invite simple reconfirmation, (b) invite topical elaboration, or (c) solicit an account either to reconcile diverging expectations or to manage problems in acceptability. We demonstrate how both the design of echt-turns and participants’ epistemic positioning matter to how echt-turns are treated and shape interactional trajectories. By using the notion of “inviting” a next action, we highlight the importance of conceptualizing response relevance after second-position actions, and specifically after “newsmark-type” responses, as a gradient. Data are taken from everyday and institutional interaction and presented in German with English translations.
Notes
