Difference between revisions of "Huma2023"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Bogdana Humă; Jack B. Joyce; Geoffrey Raymond; |Title=What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance...")
 
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Author(s)=Bogdana Humă; Jack B. Joyce; Geoffrey Raymond;
 
|Author(s)=Bogdana Humă; Jack B. Joyce; Geoffrey Raymond;
 
|Title=What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment
 
|Title=What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Resistance; Social interaction; Ethnomethodology; Conversation analysis; Discursive psychology; In press
+
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Resistance; Social interaction; Ethnomethodology; Conversation analysis; Discursive psychology
 
|Key=Huma2023
 
|Key=Huma2023
 
|Year=2023
 
|Year=2023
 
|Language=English
 
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology
 
|Journal=Journal of Language and Social Psychology
 +
|Volume=42
 +
|Number=5-6
 +
|Pages=497-522
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X231185525
 
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261927X231185525
 
|DOI=10.1177/0261927X231185525
 
|DOI=10.1177/0261927X231185525
 
|Abstract=In this introductory article to the special issue on Resistance in Talk-in-Interaction, we review the vast body of research that has respecified resistance by investigating it as and when it occurs in real-life encounters. Using methodological approaches such as ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and discursive psychology, studies of resistance “in the wild” treat social interaction as a sequentially organized, joint enterprise. As a result, resistance emerges as the alternative to cooperation and therefore, on each occasion, resistant actions are designed to deal with the sequential and moral accountabilities that arise from the specifics of the situation. By documenting the wide array of linguistic, prosodic, sequential, and embodied resources that individuals use to resist the requirements set by interlocutors’ prior turns, this article provides the first comprehensive overview of existing research on resistance as an interactional accomplishment.
 
|Abstract=In this introductory article to the special issue on Resistance in Talk-in-Interaction, we review the vast body of research that has respecified resistance by investigating it as and when it occurs in real-life encounters. Using methodological approaches such as ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and discursive psychology, studies of resistance “in the wild” treat social interaction as a sequentially organized, joint enterprise. As a result, resistance emerges as the alternative to cooperation and therefore, on each occasion, resistant actions are designed to deal with the sequential and moral accountabilities that arise from the specifics of the situation. By documenting the wide array of linguistic, prosodic, sequential, and embodied resources that individuals use to resist the requirements set by interlocutors’ prior turns, this article provides the first comprehensive overview of existing research on resistance as an interactional accomplishment.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 02:02, 17 October 2023

Huma2023
BibType ARTICLE
Key Huma2023
Author(s) Bogdana Humă, Jack B. Joyce, Geoffrey Raymond
Title What Does “Resistance” Actually Look Like? The Respecification of Resistance as an Interactional Accomplishment
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Resistance, Social interaction, Ethnomethodology, Conversation analysis, Discursive psychology
Publisher
Year 2023
Language English
City
Month
Journal Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Volume 42
Number 5-6
Pages 497-522
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/0261927X231185525
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

In this introductory article to the special issue on Resistance in Talk-in-Interaction, we review the vast body of research that has respecified resistance by investigating it as and when it occurs in real-life encounters. Using methodological approaches such as ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and discursive psychology, studies of resistance “in the wild” treat social interaction as a sequentially organized, joint enterprise. As a result, resistance emerges as the alternative to cooperation and therefore, on each occasion, resistant actions are designed to deal with the sequential and moral accountabilities that arise from the specifics of the situation. By documenting the wide array of linguistic, prosodic, sequential, and embodied resources that individuals use to resist the requirements set by interlocutors’ prior turns, this article provides the first comprehensive overview of existing research on resistance as an interactional accomplishment.

Notes