Difference between revisions of "Fox-Heinemann2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Barbara A. Fox; Trine Heinemann; |Title=Issues in Action Formation: Requests and the Problem with x |Tag(s)=EMCA; Action Formation; Conv...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Action Formation; Conversation Analysis; Requests | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Action Formation; Conversation Analysis; Requests | ||
|Key=Fox-Heinemann2017 | |Key=Fox-Heinemann2017 | ||
| − | |||
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
|Pages=31–64 | |Pages=31–64 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opli-2017-0003/html |
| − | |Abstract=Abstract: In previous interactional studies of formats for utterances doing requests, attention has been given to the initial verb (such as can/could or wonder) and possibly the subject (especially I vs you). The current study examines the main types of grammatical variation found in what we call the “x component,” that is the segment after the initial verb and subject. We examine two types of requests: those with can you x and | + | |DOI=10.1515/opli-2017-0003 |
| − | those with wonder x, and we find that variations in the x component in these requests are associated with variations in the unfolding development of the request sequences. We thus suggest that the x component is crucial to the interactional work accomplished by the requesting utterance. | + | |Abstract=Abstract: In previous interactional studies of formats for utterances doing requests, attention has been given to the initial verb (such as can/could or wonder) and possibly the subject (especially I vs you). The current study examines the main types of grammatical variation found in what we call the “x component,” that is the segment after the initial verb and subject. We examine two types of requests: those with can you x and those with wonder x, and we find that variations in the x component in these requests are associated with variations in the unfolding development of the request sequences. We thus suggest that the x component is crucial to the interactional work accomplished by the requesting utterance. The data are drawn from a larger project on requests in American English at a shoe shop in North America. |
| − | The data are drawn from a larger project on requests in American English at a shoe shop in North America. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:52, 13 September 2023
| Fox-Heinemann2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Fox-Heinemann2017 |
| Author(s) | Barbara A. Fox, Trine Heinemann |
| Title | Issues in Action Formation: Requests and the Problem with x |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Action Formation, Conversation Analysis, Requests |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Open Linguistics |
| Volume | 3 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 31–64 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/opli-2017-0003 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Abstract: In previous interactional studies of formats for utterances doing requests, attention has been given to the initial verb (such as can/could or wonder) and possibly the subject (especially I vs you). The current study examines the main types of grammatical variation found in what we call the “x component,” that is the segment after the initial verb and subject. We examine two types of requests: those with can you x and those with wonder x, and we find that variations in the x component in these requests are associated with variations in the unfolding development of the request sequences. We thus suggest that the x component is crucial to the interactional work accomplished by the requesting utterance. The data are drawn from a larger project on requests in American English at a shoe shop in North America.
Notes
