Difference between revisions of "Vazquez-Carranza2017a"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Vazquez-Carranza:2017a to Vazquez-Carranza2017a without leaving a redirect) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Ariel Vázquez Carranza; |
|Title=Some uses of 'no' in talk-in-interactions | |Title=Some uses of 'no' in talk-in-interactions | ||
| − | |||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; no; response particles | |Tag(s)=EMCA; no; response particles | ||
| − | | | + | |Key=Vazquez-Carranza2017a |
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=International Review of Pragmatics | |Journal=International Review of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=9 | |Volume=9 | ||
| − | |Number= | + | |Number=2 |
|Pages=224-247 | |Pages=224-247 | ||
| + | |URL=https://brill.com/view/journals/irp/9/2/article-p224_3.xml | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1163/18773109-00901009 | ||
| + | |Abstract=Using the methodology of Conversation Analysis, the present investigation studies the particle ‘no’ in Mexican Spanish naturally occurring interactions. ‘No’ is analysed in two sequential contexts: assessment sequences (i.e., two assessments, each produced by different speakers, one after the other) and activity transition (i.e., when speakers go from one activity/topic to another). In the first sequential context ‘no’ appears prefacing an upgraded version of the assessment produced adjacently before (i.e., in second position of the sequence). In this context, ‘no’ works to show primacy of epistemic rights, it marks the previous assessment as an understatement, ‘no’ agrees with the previous assessment’s valence but not with its strength. A multiple saying of ‘no’ prefaces an assessment and makes it more emphatic. In the second sequential context, ‘no’ appears to work as a marker of transition between conversational activities, i.e, speakers use ‘no’ to transit from one activity/topic to another. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:00, 31 August 2023
| Vazquez-Carranza2017a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Vazquez-Carranza2017a |
| Author(s) | Ariel Vázquez Carranza |
| Title | Some uses of 'no' in talk-in-interactions |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, no, response particles |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | International Review of Pragmatics |
| Volume | 9 |
| Number | 2 |
| Pages | 224-247 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1163/18773109-00901009 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Using the methodology of Conversation Analysis, the present investigation studies the particle ‘no’ in Mexican Spanish naturally occurring interactions. ‘No’ is analysed in two sequential contexts: assessment sequences (i.e., two assessments, each produced by different speakers, one after the other) and activity transition (i.e., when speakers go from one activity/topic to another). In the first sequential context ‘no’ appears prefacing an upgraded version of the assessment produced adjacently before (i.e., in second position of the sequence). In this context, ‘no’ works to show primacy of epistemic rights, it marks the previous assessment as an understatement, ‘no’ agrees with the previous assessment’s valence but not with its strength. A multiple saying of ‘no’ prefaces an assessment and makes it more emphatic. In the second sequential context, ‘no’ appears to work as a marker of transition between conversational activities, i.e, speakers use ‘no’ to transit from one activity/topic to another.
Notes
