Difference between revisions of "Birknes-etal2012"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) m |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) m (typo in author's name) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
− | |Author(s)=Karin Birkner; Sofie Henricson; Camilla | + | |Author(s)=Karin Birkner; Sofie Henricson; Camilla Lindholm; Martin Pfeiffer; |
|Title=Grammar and self-repair: Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrases | |Title=Grammar and self-repair: Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrases | ||
|Tag(s)=IL; Repair; Retraction; Prepositional phrases; German--Swedish | |Tag(s)=IL; Repair; Retraction; Prepositional phrases; German--Swedish | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | |Journal=Journal of Pragmatics | ||
|Volume=44 | |Volume=44 | ||
− | |Pages= | + | |Number=11 |
− | |URL= | + | |Pages=1413–1433 |
+ | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378216612001439 | ||
|DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.003 | |DOI=10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.003 | ||
− | |Abstract=This article presents the results of a | + | |Abstract=This article presents the results of a German–Swedish comparative study on retractions in self-repair within prepositional phrases. Retraction, i.e., when a speaker returns to an earlier point within an unfolding grammatical structure, is a common resource used by both German and Swedish speakers when completing such actions as substituting, deleting, inserting, or repeating parts of an utterance. However, this resource is not necessarily used in the same ways in German and Swedish. Typological differences in the languages, such as word order and morphosyntactic characteristics, can affect the pattern of retraction (cf. Fox et al., 2009a, Fox et al., 2010). This paper examines whether grammatical differences in German and Swedish influence the retraction patterns in these languages. |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 04:47, 25 July 2023
Birknes-etal2012 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Birknes-etal2012 |
Author(s) | Karin Birkner, Sofie Henricson, Camilla Lindholm, Martin Pfeiffer |
Title | Grammar and self-repair: Retraction patterns in German and Swedish prepositional phrases |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | IL, Repair, Retraction, Prepositional phrases, German--Swedish |
Publisher | |
Year | 2012 |
Language | |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
Volume | 44 |
Number | 11 |
Pages | 1413–1433 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.003 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
This article presents the results of a German–Swedish comparative study on retractions in self-repair within prepositional phrases. Retraction, i.e., when a speaker returns to an earlier point within an unfolding grammatical structure, is a common resource used by both German and Swedish speakers when completing such actions as substituting, deleting, inserting, or repeating parts of an utterance. However, this resource is not necessarily used in the same ways in German and Swedish. Typological differences in the languages, such as word order and morphosyntactic characteristics, can affect the pattern of retraction (cf. Fox et al., 2009a, Fox et al., 2010). This paper examines whether grammatical differences in German and Swedish influence the retraction patterns in these languages.
Notes