Difference between revisions of "Travers2020"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-01-28 12:45:54) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
| − | | | + | |BibType=INCOLLECTION |
| − | | | + | |Author(s)=Max Travers; |
|Title=Craft Skills and Legal Rules: How Australian Magistrates Make Bail Decisions | |Title=Craft Skills and Legal Rules: How Australian Magistrates Make Bail Decisions | ||
| − | | | + | |Editor(s)=Baudouin Dupret; Julie Colemans; Max Travers; |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Courtroom; Legal; Law; Ethnomethodology; Australian; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Courtroom; Legal; Law; Ethnomethodology; Australian; |
| − | | | + | |Key=Travers2020 |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
|Publisher=Routledge | |Publisher=Routledge | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
| − | | | + | |Language=English |
| + | |Booktitle=Legal Rules in Practice: In the Midst of Law's Life | ||
|Pages=163–181 | |Pages=163–181 | ||
| + | |URL=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003046776-11/craft-skills-legal-rules-max-travers | ||
|DOI=10.4324/9781003046776-11 | |DOI=10.4324/9781003046776-11 | ||
| + | |ISBN=978-1-00-304677-6 | ||
|Abstract=This paper pursues an ethnomethodological approach in describing the work of magistrates making bail decisions in Australian lower courts. Because researchers are committed to examining the practical nature of occupational work, this approach has potential to provide a detailed account of rule-use in legal settings. It will be shown how magistrates employ and are permitted to employ considerable discretion when working within bail legislation, and in interpreting legislation. This account of legal work is relevant to long-standing debates about rule skepticism and formalism; and to policy debates that seek to limit judicial discretion. | |Abstract=This paper pursues an ethnomethodological approach in describing the work of magistrates making bail decisions in Australian lower courts. Because researchers are committed to examining the practical nature of occupational work, this approach has potential to provide a detailed account of rule-use in legal settings. It will be shown how magistrates employ and are permitted to employ considerable discretion when working within bail legislation, and in interpreting legislation. This account of legal work is relevant to long-standing debates about rule skepticism and formalism; and to policy debates that seek to limit judicial discretion. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:44, 3 July 2023
| Travers2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | INCOLLECTION |
| Key | Travers2020 |
| Author(s) | Max Travers |
| Title | Craft Skills and Legal Rules: How Australian Magistrates Make Bail Decisions |
| Editor(s) | Baudouin Dupret, Julie Colemans, Max Travers |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Courtroom, Legal, Law, Ethnomethodology, Australian |
| Publisher | Routledge |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | |
| Volume | |
| Number | |
| Pages | 163–181 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.4324/9781003046776-11 |
| ISBN | 978-1-00-304677-6 |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | Legal Rules in Practice: In the Midst of Law's Life |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This paper pursues an ethnomethodological approach in describing the work of magistrates making bail decisions in Australian lower courts. Because researchers are committed to examining the practical nature of occupational work, this approach has potential to provide a detailed account of rule-use in legal settings. It will be shown how magistrates employ and are permitted to employ considerable discretion when working within bail legislation, and in interpreting legislation. This account of legal work is relevant to long-standing debates about rule skepticism and formalism; and to policy debates that seek to limit judicial discretion.
Notes
