Difference between revisions of "Llewellyn2022"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; Jon Hindmarsh; Robin Burrow; |Title=Coalitions of touch: Balancing restraint and haptic soothing in the veterinary clini...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; Jon Hindmarsh; Robin Burrow; | |Author(s)=Nick Llewellyn; Jon Hindmarsh; Robin Burrow; | ||
|Title=Coalitions of touch: Balancing restraint and haptic soothing in the veterinary clinic | |Title=Coalitions of touch: Balancing restraint and haptic soothing in the veterinary clinic | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Animals; Medicine | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Animals; Medicine |
|Key=Llewellyn2022 | |Key=Llewellyn2022 | ||
|Year=2022 | |Year=2022 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness | |Journal=Sociology of Health & Illness | ||
| + | |Volume=44 | ||
| + | |Number=4-5 | ||
| + | |Pages=725–744 | ||
|URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9566.13458 | |URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1467-9566.13458 | ||
|DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.13458 | |DOI=10.1111/1467-9566.13458 | ||
|Abstract=This article responds to recent calls to further incorporate the study of animal health care into the sociology of health and illness. It focuses on a theme with a long tradition in medical sociology, namely clinical communication, but explores matters distinctive to veterinary practice. Drawing on video recordings of 60 consultations across three small animal veterinary clinics in the United Kingdom, we explore how clients and veterinarians (or “vets”) fashion fleeting “coalitions of touch,” that aptly position the animal to enable the performance of medical work, often in the face of physical resistance. Building on recent developments in the study of haptic sociality, we analyse how care and emotional concern for animal patients is communicated through various forms of embodied action; thus, how the problematics of forced care and restraint are mitigated through distinctive ways of touching and holding animal patients. Moreover, while prior studies of small animal veterinary work have highlighted the significance of talk within the clinician–animal–client triad, we reveal the fundamentally embodied and collaborative work of managing and controlling patients during sometimes intense and fast-moving episodes of veterinary care. | |Abstract=This article responds to recent calls to further incorporate the study of animal health care into the sociology of health and illness. It focuses on a theme with a long tradition in medical sociology, namely clinical communication, but explores matters distinctive to veterinary practice. Drawing on video recordings of 60 consultations across three small animal veterinary clinics in the United Kingdom, we explore how clients and veterinarians (or “vets”) fashion fleeting “coalitions of touch,” that aptly position the animal to enable the performance of medical work, often in the face of physical resistance. Building on recent developments in the study of haptic sociality, we analyse how care and emotional concern for animal patients is communicated through various forms of embodied action; thus, how the problematics of forced care and restraint are mitigated through distinctive ways of touching and holding animal patients. Moreover, while prior studies of small animal veterinary work have highlighted the significance of talk within the clinician–animal–client triad, we reveal the fundamentally embodied and collaborative work of managing and controlling patients during sometimes intense and fast-moving episodes of veterinary care. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:06, 4 June 2022
| Llewellyn2022 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Llewellyn2022 |
| Author(s) | Nick Llewellyn, Jon Hindmarsh, Robin Burrow |
| Title | Coalitions of touch: Balancing restraint and haptic soothing in the veterinary clinic |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Animals, Medicine |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2022 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Sociology of Health & Illness |
| Volume | 44 |
| Number | 4-5 |
| Pages | 725–744 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.13458 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article responds to recent calls to further incorporate the study of animal health care into the sociology of health and illness. It focuses on a theme with a long tradition in medical sociology, namely clinical communication, but explores matters distinctive to veterinary practice. Drawing on video recordings of 60 consultations across three small animal veterinary clinics in the United Kingdom, we explore how clients and veterinarians (or “vets”) fashion fleeting “coalitions of touch,” that aptly position the animal to enable the performance of medical work, often in the face of physical resistance. Building on recent developments in the study of haptic sociality, we analyse how care and emotional concern for animal patients is communicated through various forms of embodied action; thus, how the problematics of forced care and restraint are mitigated through distinctive ways of touching and holding animal patients. Moreover, while prior studies of small animal veterinary work have highlighted the significance of talk within the clinician–animal–client triad, we reveal the fundamentally embodied and collaborative work of managing and controlling patients during sometimes intense and fast-moving episodes of veterinary care.
Notes
