Difference between revisions of "Enfield-Sidnell2017"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=BOOK |Author(s)=N. J. Enfield; Jack Sidnell; |Title=The Concept of Action |Tag(s)=EMCA; Linguistic Anthropology; Action |Key=Enfield-Sidnell2017 |Publisher...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Address=Cambridge | |Address=Cambridge | ||
− | |Pages=242 | + | |Pages=242 |
+ | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/ru/academic/subjects/anthropology/linguistic-anthropology/concept-action | ||
|ISBN=9780521895286 | |ISBN=9780521895286 | ||
|Series=New Departures in Anthropology | |Series=New Departures in Anthropology |
Latest revision as of 07:59, 18 February 2022
Enfield-Sidnell2017 | |
---|---|
BibType | BOOK |
Key | Enfield-Sidnell2017 |
Author(s) | N. J. Enfield, Jack Sidnell |
Title | The Concept of Action |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | EMCA, Linguistic Anthropology, Action |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Year | 2017 |
Language | English |
City | Cambridge |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | 242 |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | 9780521895286 |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | New Departures in Anthropology |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
When people do things with words, how do we know what they are doing? Many scholars have assumed a category of things called actions: 'requests', 'proposals', 'complaints', 'excuses'. The idea is both convenient and intuitive, but as this book argues, it is a spurious concept of action. In interaction, a person's primary task is to decide how to respond, not to label what someone just did. The labeling of actions is a meta-level process, appropriate only when we wish to draw attention to others' behaviors in order to quiz, sanction, praise, blame, or otherwise hold them to account. This book develops a new account of action grounded in certain fundamental ideas about the nature of human sociality: that social conduct is naturally interpreted as purposeful; that human behavior is shaped under a tyranny of social accountability; and that language is our central resource for social action and reaction.
Proposes a view of social action with unprecedented commitment to empirical data, allowing readers to evaluate current views of action based on how language is actually used Presents a new theory of social action through language, challenging long-held ideas of the nature of speech acts
Notes