Difference between revisions of "Reber2021"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2021-12-17 08:02:06) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
+ | |BibType=BOOK | ||
+ | |Author(s)=Elisabeth Reber; | ||
+ | |Title=Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time: Exploring Recent Change | ||
+ | |Tag(s)=English language; Great Britain; Indirect discourse; Language; Legislators; Linguistic change; Prime ministers; EMCA | ||
|Key=Reber2021 | |Key=Reber2021 | ||
− | | | + | |Publisher=Cambridge University Press |
− | | | + | |Year=2021 |
− | | | + | |Language=English |
− | | | + | |Address=Cambridge, UK; New York |
+ | |URL=https://www.cambridge.org/ru/academic/subjects/languages-linguistics/history-english-language/quoting-parliamentary-question-time-exploring-recent-change | ||
|ISBN=978-1-108-86989-8 | |ISBN=978-1-108-86989-8 | ||
− | |||
|Series=Studies in English language | |Series=Studies in English language | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|Abstract=Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods– | |Abstract=Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods– | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 07:56, 18 February 2022
Reber2021 | |
---|---|
BibType | BOOK |
Key | Reber2021 |
Author(s) | Elisabeth Reber |
Title | Quoting in Parliamentary Question Time: Exploring Recent Change |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | English language, Great Britain, Indirect discourse, Language, Legislators, Linguistic change, Prime ministers, EMCA |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Year | 2021 |
Language | English |
City | Cambridge, UK; New York |
Month | |
Journal | |
Volume | |
Number | |
Pages | |
URL | Link |
DOI | |
ISBN | 978-1-108-86989-8 |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | Studies in English language |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
Language change in contemporary English represents a burgeoning field and has primarily been studied from a corpus-linguistic perspective since the mid-1990s (e.g., Hundt and Mair 1999; Leech et al. 2009; Mair 2006; Mair and Leech 2006). Despite relevant article-length investigations on historical recordings from the perspectives of Historical Pragmatics (Jucker and Landert 2015) and Conversation Analysis (Clayman and Heritage 2002a; Clayman et al. 2006, 2007; Heritage and Clayman 2013), as well as the acknowledgement of the need for historical spoken corpora in Interactional Linguistics (e.g., Barth-Weingarten 2014; Couper-Kuhlen 2011), questions of recent change in interactional English have nevertheless remained under-researched to date. Because of the lack of suitable recordings, the historical study of recent change in spoken English was not considered to be a methodologically feasible research direction even as little as a decade ago (e.g., Mair 2006: 21). Against this backdrop, the present study breaks new ground in analysing evolving practices in spoken English (here forms of reported speech) based on authentic recordings from different periods–
Notes