Difference between revisions of "Bassetti2021a"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2021-06-28 09:48:50)
 
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
 +
|BibType=ARTICLE
 +
|Author(s)=Chiara Bassetti;
 +
|Title=The Tacit Dimension of Expertise: Professional Vision at Work in Airport Security
 +
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Accounting; Collaborative work; Exhibiting understanding; Expressive order; Highlighting; Know-how; Multimodal interaction; Reasoning; Recipient design; Un(der)specified requesting; Workplace studies
 
|Key=Bassetti2021a
 
|Key=Bassetti2021a
|Key=Bassetti2021a
 
|Title=The Tacit Dimension of Expertise: Professional Vision at Work in Airport Security
 
|Author(s)=Chiara Bassetti;
 
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Accounting;Collaborative work;Exhibiting understanding;Expressive order;Highlighting;Know-how;Multimodal interaction;Reasoning;Recipient design;Un(der)specified requesting;Workplace studies
 
|BibType=ARTICLE
 
|Publisher=SAGE Publications
 
 
|Year=2021
 
|Year=2021
|Month=may
+
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
|Pages=14614456211020141
+
|Volume=23
 +
|Number=5
 +
|Pages=597-615
 +
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14614456211020141
 
|DOI=10.1177/14614456211020141
 
|DOI=10.1177/14614456211020141
|Abstract=Whereas ``professional vision'' has been mostly analyzed in apprenticeship and other settings where knowledge is made explicit or reflected upon, I focus on how expertise tacitly plays out in task-oriented interaction among practitioners. The paper considers orientation both to the coworker's (recipient design) and one's own (expressive order) expertise in the collaborative accomplishment of airport security work. I show how screeners recruit action from colleagues in largely underspecified ways, based on shared access to the visibility field and expected professional vision. Requesting is tacitly accomplished via ``highlighting,'' which also accounts for one's request. Accepting is silently achieved via locomotion, which also serves as a display of understanding. Embodied action is systematically preferred to verbal one. Talk is employed in larger proportions when the domain of scrutiny is not equally accessible to interactants, and when ``face-work'' is required.
+
|Abstract=Whereas “professional vision” has been mostly analyzed in apprenticeship and other settings where knowledge is made explicit or reflected upon, I focus on how expertise tacitly plays out in task-oriented interaction among practitioners. The paper considers orientation both to the coworker’s (recipient design) and one’s own (expressive order) expertise in the collaborative accomplishment of airport security work. I show how screeners recruit action from colleagues in largely underspecified ways, based on shared access to the visibility field and expected professional vision. Requesting is tacitly accomplished via “highlighting,which also accounts for one’s request. Accepting is silently achieved via locomotion, which also serves as a display of understanding. Embodied action is systematically preferred to verbal one. Talk is employed in larger proportions when the domain of scrutiny is not equally accessible to interactants, and when “face-work” is required.
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 10:56, 9 November 2021

Bassetti2021a
BibType ARTICLE
Key Bassetti2021a
Author(s) Chiara Bassetti
Title The Tacit Dimension of Expertise: Professional Vision at Work in Airport Security
Editor(s)
Tag(s) EMCA, Accounting, Collaborative work, Exhibiting understanding, Expressive order, Highlighting, Know-how, Multimodal interaction, Reasoning, Recipient design, Un(der)specified requesting, Workplace studies
Publisher
Year 2021
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 23
Number 5
Pages 597-615
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/14614456211020141
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

Whereas “professional vision” has been mostly analyzed in apprenticeship and other settings where knowledge is made explicit or reflected upon, I focus on how expertise tacitly plays out in task-oriented interaction among practitioners. The paper considers orientation both to the coworker’s (recipient design) and one’s own (expressive order) expertise in the collaborative accomplishment of airport security work. I show how screeners recruit action from colleagues in largely underspecified ways, based on shared access to the visibility field and expected professional vision. Requesting is tacitly accomplished via “highlighting,” which also accounts for one’s request. Accepting is silently achieved via locomotion, which also serves as a display of understanding. Embodied action is systematically preferred to verbal one. Talk is employed in larger proportions when the domain of scrutiny is not equally accessible to interactants, and when “face-work” is required.

Notes