Difference between revisions of "Caronia-etal2017"
SaulAlbert (talk | contribs) m (SaulAlbert moved page Caronia/etal/2017 to Caronia-etal2017 without leaving a redirect: We can't use special characters in page names) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Letizia Caronia; Arturo Chieregato; Marzia Saglietti; | |Author(s)=Letizia Caronia; Arturo Chieregato; Marzia Saglietti; | ||
|Title=Assembling (non) treatable cases: The communicative constitution of medical object in doctor–doctor interaction | |Title=Assembling (non) treatable cases: The communicative constitution of medical object in doctor–doctor interaction | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Antibiotic treatment recommendation; co-construction of the medical object; conversational analysis; diagnostic reasoning; doctor–doctor interaction; medical talk; team decision-making; | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Medical; Antibiotic treatment recommendation; co-construction of the medical object; conversational analysis; diagnostic reasoning; doctor–doctor interaction; medical talk; team decision-making; Medical EMCA |
| − | |Key=Caronia | + | |Key=Caronia-etal2017 |
|Year=2017 | |Year=2017 | ||
| + | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=19 | |Volume=19 | ||
|Number=1 | |Number=1 | ||
| − | |Pages= | + | |Pages=30–48 |
| + | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1461445616683594 | ||
|DOI=10.1177/1461445616683594 | |DOI=10.1177/1461445616683594 | ||
| − | |Abstract=Research on medical interactions shows how the discursive construction of the clinical case impacts diagnostic reasoning and treatment recommendations. Drawing on an ethnographic study in an intensive care unit, we illustrate how this process is at play in a ward that adopts an extreme, guideline-divergent policy as to the use of antibiotics. The article focuses on how physicians assemble the case as ‘treatable’ or ‘not yet treatable’, and how in doing so they ‘talk into being’ two contrastive policies on antibiotics and position themselves toward the one adopted in the ward. The analysis identifies the discursive resources displayed by physicians to both project an infectious disease diagnosis and resist this treatment-implicative trajectory. We argue that the | + | |Abstract=Research on medical interactions shows how the discursive construction of the clinical case impacts diagnostic reasoning and treatment recommendations. Drawing on an ethnographic study in an intensive care unit, we illustrate how this process is at play in a ward that adopts an extreme, guideline-divergent policy as to the use of antibiotics. The article focuses on how physicians assemble the case as ‘treatable’ or ‘not yet treatable’, and how in doing so they ‘talk into being’ two contrastive policies on antibiotics and position themselves toward the one adopted in the ward. The analysis identifies the discursive resources displayed by physicians to both project an infectious disease diagnosis and resist this treatment-implicative trajectory. We argue that the physicians’ contentious discursive construction of the case has crucial consequences in the way the ward’s extreme policy is jointly accomplished as a highly reflexive process sensitive to the contingencies of any particular case. |
| − | physicians’ contentious discursive construction of the case has crucial consequences in the way the ward’s extreme policy is jointly accomplished as a highly reflexive process sensitive to the contingencies of any particular case. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 22:17, 14 October 2021
| Caronia-etal2017 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Caronia-etal2017 |
| Author(s) | Letizia Caronia, Arturo Chieregato, Marzia Saglietti |
| Title | Assembling (non) treatable cases: The communicative constitution of medical object in doctor–doctor interaction |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Medical, Antibiotic treatment recommendation, co-construction of the medical object, conversational analysis, diagnostic reasoning, doctor–doctor interaction, medical talk, team decision-making, Medical EMCA |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2017 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse Studies |
| Volume | 19 |
| Number | 1 |
| Pages | 30–48 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461445616683594 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Research on medical interactions shows how the discursive construction of the clinical case impacts diagnostic reasoning and treatment recommendations. Drawing on an ethnographic study in an intensive care unit, we illustrate how this process is at play in a ward that adopts an extreme, guideline-divergent policy as to the use of antibiotics. The article focuses on how physicians assemble the case as ‘treatable’ or ‘not yet treatable’, and how in doing so they ‘talk into being’ two contrastive policies on antibiotics and position themselves toward the one adopted in the ward. The analysis identifies the discursive resources displayed by physicians to both project an infectious disease diagnosis and resist this treatment-implicative trajectory. We argue that the physicians’ contentious discursive construction of the case has crucial consequences in the way the ward’s extreme policy is jointly accomplished as a highly reflexive process sensitive to the contingencies of any particular case.
Notes
