Difference between revisions of "Due2021a"
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
(No difference)
| |
Revision as of 07:30, 17 February 2021
| Due2021a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Due2021a |
| Author(s) | Brian Due |
| Title | RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, F-formation, ethnomethodology, multimodal conversation analysis, telepresence robot, mobility, mediated interaction, Peircean semiotics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | |
| Number | 238 |
| Pages | 253–278 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2018-0148 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.
Notes
