Difference between revisions of "Due2021a"
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Brian Due; |Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot |Tag(s)=EMCA; In Pres...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Brian Due; | |Author(s)=Brian Due; | ||
|Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot | |Title=RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; F-formation; ethnomethodology; multimodal conversation analysis; telepresence robot; mobility; mediated interaction; Peircean semiotics |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Due2021a |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2021 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Semiotica | |Journal=Semiotica | ||
| + | |Number=238 | ||
| + | |Pages=253–278 | ||
|URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/ahead-of-print/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148.xml | |URL=https://www.degruyter.com/view/journals/semi/ahead-of-print/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148/article-10.1515-sem-2018-0148.xml | ||
|DOI=10.1515/sem-2018-0148 | |DOI=10.1515/sem-2018-0148 | ||
|Abstract=Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world. | |Abstract=Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 07:30, 17 February 2021
| Due2021a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Due2021a |
| Author(s) | Brian Due |
| Title | RoboDoc: Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, F-formation, ethnomethodology, multimodal conversation analysis, telepresence robot, mobility, mediated interaction, Peircean semiotics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2021 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Semiotica |
| Volume | |
| Number | 238 |
| Pages | 253–278 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1515/sem-2018-0148 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Face-to-face interaction is a primordial site for human activity and intersubjectivity. Empirical studies have shown how people reflexively exhibit a face orientation and work to establish a formation in which everyone is facing each other in local participation frameworks. The Face has also been described by, e.g., Levinas as the basis for a first ethical philosophy. Humans have established these Face-formations when interacting since time immemorial, but what happens when one of the participants is present through a telepresence robot? Based on ethnomethodology, Peircean/Goodwinian semiotics, multimodal conversation analysis and video data from a Danish residential rehabilitation center, the article shows the ways in which participants manage to interactively, cooperatively, and moment by moment achieve an F-formation in situ. The article contributes a detailed analysis and discussion of the kind of participant a telepresence robot is, in and through situated interactions: I propose that we term this participant the RoboDoc, given that it is an assemblage of a doctor who controls a robot. By focusing on the affordances of mobility, the article contributes to a renewed understanding of the importance and relevance of establishing Face-orientations in an increasingly technofied telepresence world.
Notes
