Difference between revisions of "Magnusson2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Simon Magnusson |Title=Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings |Tag(s)=EMCA; Authority; In...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Simon Magnusson | |Author(s)=Simon Magnusson | ||
|Title=Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings | |Title=Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Authority | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Authority; Participatory democracy; Instructions; Youth participation; Deontics |
|Key=Magnusson2020 | |Key=Magnusson2020 | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Discourse & Communication | |Journal=Discourse & Communication | ||
| + | |Volume=14 | ||
| + | |Number=6 | ||
| + | |Pages=600–618 | ||
|URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1750481320939704 | |URL=https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1750481320939704 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1177/1750481320939704 |
|Abstract=Young citizens are increasingly being invited to take part in participatory democracy meetings as joint decision-making has grown popular in public administration. The backbone of participatory democracy is that some authority is granted to the citizenry and by drawing on video data (38 hours) from a year-long participatory project, this conversation analytic study shows that the adolescents are instructed to a deontic role rooted in epistemics, benefactive considerations, as well as temporal aspects relating to future citizenship and hope. The institutional representatives perform actions that determine how the adolescents should, in their turn, perform actions of influence. In this way, authority is ascribed through an ambivalent configuration in which compliance with the directives is supposed to establish a strengthened deontic position. | |Abstract=Young citizens are increasingly being invited to take part in participatory democracy meetings as joint decision-making has grown popular in public administration. The backbone of participatory democracy is that some authority is granted to the citizenry and by drawing on video data (38 hours) from a year-long participatory project, this conversation analytic study shows that the adolescents are instructed to a deontic role rooted in epistemics, benefactive considerations, as well as temporal aspects relating to future citizenship and hope. The institutional representatives perform actions that determine how the adolescents should, in their turn, perform actions of influence. In this way, authority is ascribed through an ambivalent configuration in which compliance with the directives is supposed to establish a strengthened deontic position. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:21, 27 December 2020
| Magnusson2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Magnusson2020 |
| Author(s) | Simon Magnusson |
| Title | Constructing young citizens’ deontic authority in participatory democracy meetings |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Authority, Participatory democracy, Instructions, Youth participation, Deontics |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Discourse & Communication |
| Volume | 14 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 600–618 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1177/1750481320939704 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Young citizens are increasingly being invited to take part in participatory democracy meetings as joint decision-making has grown popular in public administration. The backbone of participatory democracy is that some authority is granted to the citizenry and by drawing on video data (38 hours) from a year-long participatory project, this conversation analytic study shows that the adolescents are instructed to a deontic role rooted in epistemics, benefactive considerations, as well as temporal aspects relating to future citizenship and hope. The institutional representatives perform actions that determine how the adolescents should, in their turn, perform actions of influence. In this way, authority is ascribed through an ambivalent configuration in which compliance with the directives is supposed to establish a strengthened deontic position.
Notes
