Difference between revisions of "Kim2020a"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Du Re Kim |Title=Emergence of Proactive Self-Initiated Self-Repair as an Indicator of L2 IC Development |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional comp...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|Author(s)=Du Re Kim | |Author(s)=Du Re Kim | ||
|Title=Emergence of Proactive Self-Initiated Self-Repair as an Indicator of L2 IC Development | |Title=Emergence of Proactive Self-Initiated Self-Repair as an Indicator of L2 IC Development | ||
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional competence; Repair; Self-repair; L2 | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Interactional competence; Repair; Self-repair; L2 |
| − | |Key= | + | |Key=Kim2020a |
| − | |Year= | + | |Year=2020 |
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Applied Linguistics | |Journal=Applied Linguistics | ||
| + | |Volume=41 | ||
| + | |Number=6 | ||
| + | |Pages=901–921 | ||
|URL=https://academic.oup.com/applij/advance-article/doi/10.1093/applin/amz047/5602178 | |URL=https://academic.oup.com/applij/advance-article/doi/10.1093/applin/amz047/5602178 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1093/applin/amz047 |
|Abstract=This article finds empirical evidence of second language (L2) interactional competence (IC) and its development by focusing on one of the interactional practices: self-repairing. Compared to prior repair IC studies which mainly have explored how L2 speakers deal with evident L2-related troubles in conversation, this study focuses on cases in which they deploy self-repair when there are no such linguistic problems in previous talk, taking Mauranen’s (2006) dichotomy between retroactive and proactive self-repairs. After analyzing the conversation by L2 speakers with different oral proficiency, this study discovers whereas novice and intermediate speakers self-repair for correcting what is lexically or grammatically problematic, advanced speakers deploy self-repair mostly for pre-empting possible misunderstandings. Advanced speakers replace the previous items into words that are specific in the meaning range by fine-tuning the level of ‘granularity’ (Schegloff 2000) to avoid ambiguity and further other-initiated repair. The findings suggest that the development of L2 IC involves speakers’ ability to detect potential problems in the eyes of the recipients and replace them in advance. | |Abstract=This article finds empirical evidence of second language (L2) interactional competence (IC) and its development by focusing on one of the interactional practices: self-repairing. Compared to prior repair IC studies which mainly have explored how L2 speakers deal with evident L2-related troubles in conversation, this study focuses on cases in which they deploy self-repair when there are no such linguistic problems in previous talk, taking Mauranen’s (2006) dichotomy between retroactive and proactive self-repairs. After analyzing the conversation by L2 speakers with different oral proficiency, this study discovers whereas novice and intermediate speakers self-repair for correcting what is lexically or grammatically problematic, advanced speakers deploy self-repair mostly for pre-empting possible misunderstandings. Advanced speakers replace the previous items into words that are specific in the meaning range by fine-tuning the level of ‘granularity’ (Schegloff 2000) to avoid ambiguity and further other-initiated repair. The findings suggest that the development of L2 IC involves speakers’ ability to detect potential problems in the eyes of the recipients and replace them in advance. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 01:16, 27 December 2020
| Kim2020a | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Kim2020a |
| Author(s) | Du Re Kim |
| Title | Emergence of Proactive Self-Initiated Self-Repair as an Indicator of L2 IC Development |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Interactional competence, Repair, Self-repair, L2 |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Applied Linguistics |
| Volume | 41 |
| Number | 6 |
| Pages | 901–921 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1093/applin/amz047 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
This article finds empirical evidence of second language (L2) interactional competence (IC) and its development by focusing on one of the interactional practices: self-repairing. Compared to prior repair IC studies which mainly have explored how L2 speakers deal with evident L2-related troubles in conversation, this study focuses on cases in which they deploy self-repair when there are no such linguistic problems in previous talk, taking Mauranen’s (2006) dichotomy between retroactive and proactive self-repairs. After analyzing the conversation by L2 speakers with different oral proficiency, this study discovers whereas novice and intermediate speakers self-repair for correcting what is lexically or grammatically problematic, advanced speakers deploy self-repair mostly for pre-empting possible misunderstandings. Advanced speakers replace the previous items into words that are specific in the meaning range by fine-tuning the level of ‘granularity’ (Schegloff 2000) to avoid ambiguity and further other-initiated repair. The findings suggest that the development of L2 IC involves speakers’ ability to detect potential problems in the eyes of the recipients and replace them in advance.
Notes
