Difference between revisions of "Sadler2020"

From emcawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(BibTeX auto import 2020-07-30 08:47:26)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{BibEntry
 
{{BibEntry
|Key=Sadler2020
+
|BibType=ARTICLE
|Key=Sadler2020
+
|Author(s)=Misumi Sadler;
 
|Title=Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity
 
|Title=Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity
|Author(s)=Misumi Sadler;
 
 
|Tag(s)=construction; Japanese; discourse analysis; formulaicity; grammar-pragmatics interface; interaction; intersubjectivity; involvement; negation; negative suffix; phonological reduction; repetition; structural fixedness
 
|Tag(s)=construction; Japanese; discourse analysis; formulaicity; grammar-pragmatics interface; interaction; intersubjectivity; involvement; negation; negative suffix; phonological reduction; repetition; structural fixedness
|BibType=ARTICLE
+
|Key=Sadler2020
|Publisher=SAGE Publications Ltd
 
 
|Year=2020
 
|Year=2020
|Month=aug
+
|Language=English
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Journal=Discourse Studies
 
|Volume=22
 
|Volume=22

Latest revision as of 04:21, 27 October 2020

Sadler2020
BibType ARTICLE
Key Sadler2020
Author(s) Misumi Sadler
Title Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity
Editor(s)
Tag(s) construction, Japanese, discourse analysis, formulaicity, grammar-pragmatics interface, interaction, intersubjectivity, involvement, negation, negative suffix, phonological reduction, repetition, structural fixedness
Publisher
Year 2020
Language English
City
Month
Journal Discourse Studies
Volume 22
Number 4
Pages 460–482
URL Link
DOI 10.1177/1461445620914671
ISBN
Organization
Institution
School
Type
Edition
Series
Howpublished
Book title
Chapter

Download BibTex

Abstract

The study investigates how speakers use ‘ nai-expressions' (a verb root + the negative suffix (a)nai as in shabere-nai ‘cannot speak' and ik-anai ‘will/do not go') in naturally occurring conversation. The data demonstrate that although negative utterances have been considered to be ‘grammatical' constructions that simply negate the truth value of a proposition, nai-expressions show formulaic tendencies and serve not only to express a speaker's emotional personal stance on a particular story/event but also to create interpersonal space with other conversation participant(s) and to involve them in the story/event. The patterns which emerged from the data are quite similar to those in Ono and Thompson's study on Japanese adjectives. As they pointed out, some of nai-expressions in the data may also be re-analyzed as adjectives.

Notes