Difference between revisions of "Sadler2020"
BogdanaHuma (talk | contribs) (BibTeX auto import 2020-07-30 08:47:26) |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
− | | | + | |BibType=ARTICLE |
− | | | + | |Author(s)=Misumi Sadler; |
|Title=Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity | |Title=Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity | ||
− | |||
|Tag(s)=construction; Japanese; discourse analysis; formulaicity; grammar-pragmatics interface; interaction; intersubjectivity; involvement; negation; negative suffix; phonological reduction; repetition; structural fixedness | |Tag(s)=construction; Japanese; discourse analysis; formulaicity; grammar-pragmatics interface; interaction; intersubjectivity; involvement; negation; negative suffix; phonological reduction; repetition; structural fixedness | ||
− | | | + | |Key=Sadler2020 |
− | |||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
− | | | + | |Language=English |
|Journal=Discourse Studies | |Journal=Discourse Studies | ||
|Volume=22 | |Volume=22 |
Latest revision as of 04:21, 27 October 2020
Sadler2020 | |
---|---|
BibType | ARTICLE |
Key | Sadler2020 |
Author(s) | Misumi Sadler |
Title | Japanese negative suffix nai in conversation: Its formulaicity and intersubjectivity |
Editor(s) | |
Tag(s) | construction, Japanese, discourse analysis, formulaicity, grammar-pragmatics interface, interaction, intersubjectivity, involvement, negation, negative suffix, phonological reduction, repetition, structural fixedness |
Publisher | |
Year | 2020 |
Language | English |
City | |
Month | |
Journal | Discourse Studies |
Volume | 22 |
Number | 4 |
Pages | 460–482 |
URL | Link |
DOI | 10.1177/1461445620914671 |
ISBN | |
Organization | |
Institution | |
School | |
Type | |
Edition | |
Series | |
Howpublished | |
Book title | |
Chapter |
Abstract
The study investigates how speakers use ‘ nai-expressions' (a verb root + the negative suffix (a)nai as in shabere-nai ‘cannot speak' and ik-anai ‘will/do not go') in naturally occurring conversation. The data demonstrate that although negative utterances have been considered to be ‘grammatical' constructions that simply negate the truth value of a proposition, nai-expressions show formulaic tendencies and serve not only to express a speaker's emotional personal stance on a particular story/event but also to create interpersonal space with other conversation participant(s) and to involve them in the story/event. The patterns which emerged from the data are quite similar to those in Ono and Thompson's study on Japanese adjectives. As they pointed out, some of nai-expressions in the data may also be re-analyzed as adjectives.
Notes