Difference between revisions of "Montenegro-DoriHacohen2020"
ElliottHoey (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Roberto E.Montenegro; Gonen Dori-Hacohen |Title=Morals in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits...") |
AndreiKorbut (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Roberto E.Montenegro; Gonen Dori-Hacohen | + | |Author(s)=Roberto E. Montenegro; Gonen Dori-Hacohen |
| − | |Title= | + | |Title=Morality in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits |
| − | |Tag(s)=EMCA | + | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Doctor-patient interaction; Diabetes; Diabetes management; Morality; Knowledge; Health |
|Key=Montenegro-DoriHacohen2020 | |Key=Montenegro-DoriHacohen2020 | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Language=English | |Language=English | ||
|Journal=Social Science & Medicine | |Journal=Social Science & Medicine | ||
| + | |Volume=253 | ||
| + | |Pages=eid: 112925 | ||
|URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953620301441 | |URL=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953620301441 | ||
| − | |DOI= | + | |DOI=10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112925 |
|Abstract=Diabetes is a chronic illness with individual, social, and structural-level factors that contribute to its successful management. This paper utilizes conversation analysis to analyze a corpus of 60 audiotaped adult doctor-patient interactions. We examine how patients with diabetes and their physicians discuss blood glucose level management, including how physicians present patients with their test results and how patients respond to these presentations given the possible moral orientation around these activities. We show that physicians are more likely to present “good” blood sugar levels using assessments that explicitly evaluate the patients' condition. Contrastingly, physicians present “bad” glucose levels using report formats of numerical values alone. Interactionally, this requires that patients respond to these numbers by making sense of or accounting for their glucose level. The different practices of discussing blood glucose levels suggests that physicians approach this topic cautiously. This sensitivity balances epistemic asymmetry and may help physicians avoid direct moral characterizations of their patients. Our analysis connects interactional practices to the continuous negotiation of both medical epistemic responsibility and morality between physicians and patients with diabetes and the implications this may have in the medical management of this illness. | |Abstract=Diabetes is a chronic illness with individual, social, and structural-level factors that contribute to its successful management. This paper utilizes conversation analysis to analyze a corpus of 60 audiotaped adult doctor-patient interactions. We examine how patients with diabetes and their physicians discuss blood glucose level management, including how physicians present patients with their test results and how patients respond to these presentations given the possible moral orientation around these activities. We show that physicians are more likely to present “good” blood sugar levels using assessments that explicitly evaluate the patients' condition. Contrastingly, physicians present “bad” glucose levels using report formats of numerical values alone. Interactionally, this requires that patients respond to these numbers by making sense of or accounting for their glucose level. The different practices of discussing blood glucose levels suggests that physicians approach this topic cautiously. This sensitivity balances epistemic asymmetry and may help physicians avoid direct moral characterizations of their patients. Our analysis connects interactional practices to the continuous negotiation of both medical epistemic responsibility and morality between physicians and patients with diabetes and the implications this may have in the medical management of this illness. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 00:54, 23 April 2020
| Montenegro-DoriHacohen2020 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Montenegro-DoriHacohen2020 |
| Author(s) | Roberto E. Montenegro, Gonen Dori-Hacohen |
| Title | Morality in sugar talk: Presenting blood glucose levels in routine diabetes medical visits |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Doctor-patient interaction, Diabetes, Diabetes management, Morality, Knowledge, Health |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2020 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Volume | 253 |
| Number | |
| Pages | eid: 112925 |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112925 |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
Diabetes is a chronic illness with individual, social, and structural-level factors that contribute to its successful management. This paper utilizes conversation analysis to analyze a corpus of 60 audiotaped adult doctor-patient interactions. We examine how patients with diabetes and their physicians discuss blood glucose level management, including how physicians present patients with their test results and how patients respond to these presentations given the possible moral orientation around these activities. We show that physicians are more likely to present “good” blood sugar levels using assessments that explicitly evaluate the patients' condition. Contrastingly, physicians present “bad” glucose levels using report formats of numerical values alone. Interactionally, this requires that patients respond to these numbers by making sense of or accounting for their glucose level. The different practices of discussing blood glucose levels suggests that physicians approach this topic cautiously. This sensitivity balances epistemic asymmetry and may help physicians avoid direct moral characterizations of their patients. Our analysis connects interactional practices to the continuous negotiation of both medical epistemic responsibility and morality between physicians and patients with diabetes and the implications this may have in the medical management of this illness.
Notes
