Difference between revisions of "Konopasek2000"
PaultenHave (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{BibEntry |BibType=ARTICLE |Author(s)=Zdenek Konopásek; Kusá, Zuzana; |Title=Re-use of life stories in an ethnomethodological research |Tag(s)=EMCA; Life Stories; data re-u...") |
JakubMlynar (talk | contribs) m (name correction) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{BibEntry | {{BibEntry | ||
|BibType=ARTICLE | |BibType=ARTICLE | ||
| − | |Author(s)=Zdenek Konopásek; Kusá | + | |Author(s)=Zdenek Konopásek; Zuzana Kusá; |
|Title=Re-use of life stories in an ethnomethodological research | |Title=Re-use of life stories in an ethnomethodological research | ||
|Tag(s)=EMCA; Life Stories; data re-use; qualitative methodology; data archives; research collaboration; ethnomethodology; transcripts; state socialism | |Tag(s)=EMCA; Life Stories; data re-use; qualitative methodology; data archives; research collaboration; ethnomethodology; transcripts; state socialism | ||
Revision as of 03:54, 2 April 2020
| Konopasek2000 | |
|---|---|
| BibType | ARTICLE |
| Key | Konopasek-Zuzana2000 |
| Author(s) | Zdenek Konopásek, Zuzana Kusá |
| Title | Re-use of life stories in an ethnomethodological research |
| Editor(s) | |
| Tag(s) | EMCA, Life Stories, data re-use, qualitative methodology, data archives, research collaboration, ethnomethodology, transcripts, state socialism |
| Publisher | |
| Year | 2000 |
| Language | English |
| City | |
| Month | |
| Journal | Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research |
| Volume | 1 |
| Number | 3 |
| Pages | |
| URL | Link |
| DOI | |
| ISBN | |
| Organization | |
| Institution | |
| School | |
| Type | |
| Edition | |
| Series | |
| Howpublished | |
| Book title | |
| Chapter | |
Abstract
In the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the age of life history archives with a wider access for the social scientists is only coming. However, secondary analysis of qualitative data is not limited to documents that are stored in public archives. It happens quite often that researchers make use of an interview transcript, or a part of it, which has originally been gathered for a different occasion. Thus, they use these data for studying new topics that are sometimes far from the original research questions and objectives. In this paper we discuss some methodological problems arising from such practice. We show that, on one hand, the ethnomethodological perspective is especially demanding on the quality and the pinpoint accuracy of transcripts and the descriptions of the interviews by which the narratives were elicited (field memos). On the other hand, however, the ethnomethodological perspective orients scholars to formulate their research objectives according to what the data itself offers. The methodological problems related to the re-use of data can hardly be resolved in advance and on a general level.
Notes
